The Impact of Mini-Grids on Rural Energy-Access Indicators in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review

Mini-grids are increasingly deployed to expand rural electrification in developing countries, yet evidence on service-quality performance remains uneven. This systematic review synthesises empirical evidence from 22 peer-reviewed studies (2005–2025) on rural mini-grid performance across six energy-access indicators: electrification rate, availability of supply, hours of supply, affordability, reliability, and consistency (power quality). Using PRISMA-guided database searches in Scopus and Web of Science, 138 records were identified; following de-duplication and screening, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. The evidence base is concentrated in Africa and Asia, and most studies adopt mixed-methods approaches combining household- and/or enterprise-level evidence with system or operational data. Across indicators, electrification outcomes are frequently positive but reported using heterogeneous metrics, often relying on connection counts rather than population-referenced rates (10/22 studies report electrification outcomes). Service availability and hours of supply vary widely, ranging from evening-only provision (~5 h/day) to near-continuous service (24 h/day), with several studies documenting demand–capacity mismatch and load shedding (9/22 quantify availability; 12/22 quantify hours). Affordability is most frequently reported (16/22 studies), spanning substantial household cost reductions in some settings to high tariffs that constrain uptake in remote contexts. Reliability is seldom quantified using extractable outage/downtime metrics (4/22 studies). No study reports standardised voltage/frequency power-quality measures; only proxy evidence relates to consistency, leaving power quality as a major evidence gap. Mini-grids can deliver meaningful improvements in rural electricity access, but the literature remains constrained by inconsistent indicator definitions, limited standardised reliability/power-quality measurement, and short monitoring horizons. Future research and regulation should prioritise harmonised service-quality metrics and longer-term, field-based performance evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19061441
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Mini-Grids on Rural Energy-Access Indicators in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review

Gabrial Anandarajah, Olivier Dessens, Ibanga Effiong
Energies
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

The Impact of Mini-Grids on Rural Energy-Access Indicators in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review

Gabrial Anandarajah, Olivier Dessens, Ibanga Effiong
article en

Abstract

Mini-grids are increasingly deployed to expand rural electrification in developing countries, yet evidence on service-quality performance remains uneven. This systematic review synthesises empirical evidence from 22 peer-reviewed studies (2005–2025) on rural mini-grid performance across six energy-access indicators: electrification rate, availability of supply, hours of supply, affordability, reliability, and consistency (power quality). Using PRISMA-guided database searches in Scopus and Web of Science, 138 records were identified; following de-duplication and screening, 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. The evidence base is concentrated in Africa and Asia, and most studies adopt mixed-methods approaches combining household- and/or enterprise-level evidence with system or operational data. Across indicators, electrification outcomes are frequently positive but reported using heterogeneous metrics, often relying on connection counts rather than population-referenced rates (10/22 studies report electrification outcomes). Service availability and hours of supply vary widely, ranging from evening-only provision (~5 h/day) to near-continuous service (24 h/day), with several studies documenting demand–capacity mismatch and load shedding (9/22 quantify availability; 12/22 quantify hours). Affordability is most frequently reported (16/22 studies), spanning substantial household cost reductions in some settings to high tariffs that constrain uptake in remote contexts. Reliability is seldom quantified using extractable outage/downtime metrics (4/22 studies). No study reports standardised voltage/frequency power-quality measures; only proxy evidence relates to consistency, leaving power quality as a major evidence gap. Mini-grids can deliver meaningful improvements in rural electricity access, but the literature remains constrained by inconsistent indicator definitions, limited standardised reliability/power-quality measurement, and short monitoring horizons. Future research and regulation should prioritise harmonised service-quality metrics and longer-term, field-based performance evaluation.

EnergiesVol. 19(6)
Energy Institute (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.