Linear mixed-effects models for analysis of longitudinal repeated measures: a conceptual framework for clinical researchers

In this paper, we provide a conceptual introduction to linear mixed-effects models (LMMs), statistical approaches that are used for analysis of longitudinal repeated-measure data, for clinical researchers with a limited statistical background. We begin by contrasting LMMs with repeated-measures analysis of variance, and highlight the limitations of the latter approach, including its restrictive assumption of sphericity and its sensitivity to dropout. We show that LMMs overcome these limitations by providing valid inferences under the missing-at-random assumption, accommodating unbalanced designs, and offering flexible options for modeling covariance structures. Beyond addressing the core assumptions of LMMs, we evaluate the implications of modeling time as a numerical versus as a categorical factor. We discuss approaches for handling baseline values, including longitudinal data analysis, constrained longitudinal data analysis, and analysis of covariance, and describe their relative strengths and limitations in both randomized and observational studies. We explain the roles of random effects and residual covariance structures and provide practical guidance for selecting candidate models by using exploratory plots and information criteria, such as the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria. Overall, by providing a clear and accessible conceptual framework, we hope to enable clinical researchers to understand, evaluate, and apply LMMs effectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Korean journal of anesthesiology
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.25877
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linear mixed-effects models for analysis of longitudinal repeated measures: a conceptual framework for clinical researchers

Kijun Song, Hye Jin Kim
Korean journal of anesthesiology
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Linear mixed-effects models for analysis of longitudinal repeated measures: a conceptual framework for clinical researchers

Kijun Song, Hye Jin Kim
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we provide a conceptual introduction to linear mixed-effects models (LMMs), statistical approaches that are used for analysis of longitudinal repeated-measure data, for clinical researchers with a limited statistical background. We begin by contrasting LMMs with repeated-measures analysis of variance, and highlight the limitations of the latter approach, including its restrictive assumption of sphericity and its sensitivity to dropout. We show that LMMs overcome these limitations by providing valid inferences under the missing-at-random assumption, accommodating unbalanced designs, and offering flexible options for modeling covariance structures. Beyond addressing the core assumptions of LMMs, we evaluate the implications of modeling time as a numerical versus as a categorical factor. We discuss approaches for handling baseline values, including longitudinal data analysis, constrained longitudinal data analysis, and analysis of covariance, and describe their relative strengths and limitations in both randomized and observational studies. We explain the roles of random effects and residual covariance structures and provide practical guidance for selecting candidate models by using exploratory plots and information criteria, such as the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria. Overall, by providing a clear and accessible conceptual framework, we hope to enable clinical researchers to understand, evaluate, and apply LMMs effectively.

Korean journal of anesthesiology
Yonsei University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.