Efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in the treatment of impending myasthenic crisis

Objective To compare the short-term efficacy and safety of efgartigimod versus intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in patients with impending myasthenic crisis (IMC). Methods This single-center, randomized, open-label, prospective comparative cohort study included 38 acetylcholine receptor antibody–positive (AChR−Ab+) patients with IMC, which was defined as rapid progression of bulbar or respiratory symptoms within ≤2 weeks, meeting at least one of the following criteria:Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) grade IVb, a Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) bulbar subscore of 3, a respiratory subscore of 2, or a combined bulbar–respiratory subscore ≥4. The participants were included and categorized into either the efgartigimod group (n=21; 10 mg/kg weekly for 4 weeks) or the IVIg group (n=17; 400 mg/kg/day for 5 days). The primary endpoints were the rate of IMC remission within one month (defined as a QMG score <2 for both the bulbar and respiratory items, or a combined bulbar plus respiratory QMG score <4, or an improvement of the MGFA classification to below class IVb, sustained for at least 24 hours.) and time to remission. Secondary outcomes comprised changes in QMG total, bulbar, and respiratory subscores, and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) from baseline to remission. Safety was assessed by rates of progression to myasthenic crisis (MC) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results Between January 2024 and March 2025, 38 patients were randomized. IMC remission rates were 90.48% with efgartigimod and 94.12% with IVIg (P = 1.000). The median time to remission was significantly shorter with efgartigimod (8 days; 95% CI: 5.75–10.67) than with IVIg (12 days; 95% CI: 9.92–13.20; P = 0.009). One patient per group progressed to myasthenic crisis (4.76% vs 5.88%). No TEAEs were reported. Conclusion Efgartigimod demonstrated comparable efficacy to IVIg for IMC remission but with a significantly faster onset, supporting its role as a rapid and safe alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1760953
Primary Topic
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in the treatment of impending myasthenic crisis

Yanzi Jin, Jiahui Peng, Q. Susan Li, Jian Yang et al.
Frontiers in Immunology
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
article

Efficacy and safety of efgartigimod in the treatment of impending myasthenic crisis

Yanzi Jin, Jiahui Peng, Q. Susan Li, Jian Yang, Li Liu, Boya Ma, Yinghui Zhang, Xiao Yang, Shuhui Zhu, Li Zhao, Yating Li, Ning Li
article en

Abstract

Objective To compare the short-term efficacy and safety of efgartigimod versus intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) in patients with impending myasthenic crisis (IMC). Methods This single-center, randomized, open-label, prospective comparative cohort study included 38 acetylcholine receptor antibody–positive (AChR−Ab+) patients with IMC, which was defined as rapid progression of bulbar or respiratory symptoms within ≤2 weeks, meeting at least one of the following criteria:Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) grade IVb, a Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) bulbar subscore of 3, a respiratory subscore of 2, or a combined bulbar–respiratory subscore ≥4. The participants were included and categorized into either the efgartigimod group (n=21; 10 mg/kg weekly for 4 weeks) or the IVIg group (n=17; 400 mg/kg/day for 5 days). The primary endpoints were the rate of IMC remission within one month (defined as a QMG score <2 for both the bulbar and respiratory items, or a combined bulbar plus respiratory QMG score <4, or an improvement of the MGFA classification to below class IVb, sustained for at least 24 hours.) and time to remission. Secondary outcomes comprised changes in QMG total, bulbar, and respiratory subscores, and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) from baseline to remission. Safety was assessed by rates of progression to myasthenic crisis (MC) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results Between January 2024 and March 2025, 38 patients were randomized. IMC remission rates were 90.48% with efgartigimod and 94.12% with IVIg (P = 1.000). The median time to remission was significantly shorter with efgartigimod (8 days; 95% CI: 5.75–10.67) than with IVIg (12 days; 95% CI: 9.92–13.20; P = 0.009). One patient per group progressed to myasthenic crisis (4.76% vs 5.88%). No TEAEs were reported. Conclusion Efgartigimod demonstrated comparable efficacy to IVIg for IMC remission but with a significantly faster onset, supporting its role as a rapid and safe alternative.

Frontiers in ImmunologyVol. 17
Ningxia Medical University (CN), Ningxia Medical University General Hospital (CN)
Ningxia Medical University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.