Trust in Regulation in a Time of Revolution

ABSTRACT This article examines trust in regulation as a core value and precondition of the modern liberal democratic regulatory state. It develops a concept of justified trust in regulation, grounded in regulatory trustworthiness—honesty, competence, and reliability—rather than in proxies such as partisan loyalty, blind faith, obedience, or resignation. The article situates this conception of regulatory trustworthiness within liberal democratic rule‐of‐law commitments to equal respect, fairness, and accountability, and shows how it underpinned late‐twentieth‐century imaginings of the “regulatory state.” It then contrasts this model with an emerging illiberal vision, exemplified by the current American President's emphasis on personal loyalty, in‐group allegiance, and zero‐sum politics—all of which actively repudiate the conditions for justified trust. Using regulatory theory and examples from contemporary US governance, the article argues that mutual justified trust between regulators and regulated actors is an indispensable “capital good” for effective, flexible, and fair regulatory regimes. It concludes that rebuilding a functional regulatory state after an illiberal turn requires explicitly naming, protecting, and measuring regulatory trustworthiness as a central liberal value, alongside the rule of law, democratic accountability, and a basic commitment to equality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Regulation & Governance
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.70141
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust in Regulation in a Time of Revolution

Cristie Ford
Regulation & Governance
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

Trust in Regulation in a Time of Revolution

Cristie Ford
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines trust in regulation as a core value and precondition of the modern liberal democratic regulatory state. It develops a concept of justified trust in regulation, grounded in regulatory trustworthiness—honesty, competence, and reliability—rather than in proxies such as partisan loyalty, blind faith, obedience, or resignation. The article situates this conception of regulatory trustworthiness within liberal democratic rule‐of‐law commitments to equal respect, fairness, and accountability, and shows how it underpinned late‐twentieth‐century imaginings of the “regulatory state.” It then contrasts this model with an emerging illiberal vision, exemplified by the current American President's emphasis on personal loyalty, in‐group allegiance, and zero‐sum politics—all of which actively repudiate the conditions for justified trust. Using regulatory theory and examples from contemporary US governance, the article argues that mutual justified trust between regulators and regulated actors is an indispensable “capital good” for effective, flexible, and fair regulatory regimes. It concludes that rebuilding a functional regulatory state after an illiberal turn requires explicitly naming, protecting, and measuring regulatory trustworthiness as a central liberal value, alongside the rule of law, democratic accountability, and a basic commitment to equality.

Regulation & Governance
University of British Columbia (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.