Differential Effect of PEEP on Overweight Individuals in a Pediatric ARDS Cohort

Background: There is limited data regarding mechanical ventilation practices in overweight patients with PARDS. Our study aims to understand the differences in ventilator management and its effect on clinical outcomes in overweight and non-overweight PARDS patients. We hypothesize that the use of PEEP had a differential effect on overweight vs non-overweight PARDS patients. Methods: This study analyzed patients recruited based on the PALICC 2015 definition of PARDS. Correlation between ventilator settings and BMI Z-score were studied using Spearman correlation. Overweight status was defined as BMI Z-score ≥ +1. Ventilator settings were analyzed in overweight vs. non-overweight groups and the association between PEEP with PICU mortality and 28-day ventilator free days was studied using multivariable regression, adjusting for age and oxygenation index and stratified by overweight status Results: 132 patients with PARDS were included in this study. There were no clinical or statistical differences in ventilator settings comparing overweight vs non-overweight patients, though there was a trend towards the use of higher PEEP with patients of higher BMI Z-scores (r = 0.19, P = .056). Among patients who were not overweight, there was a significant difference in mortality comparing patients who were adherent vs. not adherent to the PEEP/FIO2 grid [0 (0%), vs 9 (17.5%); P = .053], however, this effect was missing in the overweight group. Similarly, VFD was also improved comparing patients who were adherent vs. not adherent [21 (18.5, 23) vs. 15 (0, 21); P = .007] only in the non-overweight group. In the multivariable analysis, adherence to the PEEP/FIO2 grid was only associated with improved VFD [adjusted beta 6.05 (95% confidence interval 0.43, 11.66); P = .035] in non-overweight patients. Conclusions: The beneficial effects of the PEEP/FIO2 grid were only observed in non-overweight patients. A larger cohort is required to confirm these findings and to determine the mechanism of this effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Care
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.20244116438
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential Effect of PEEP on Overweight Individuals in a Pediatric ARDS Cohort

Chen Yun Goh, Wen Cong Lee, Herng Lee Tan, Yi-Jyun Ma et al.
Respiratory Care
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Differential Effect of PEEP on Overweight Individuals in a Pediatric ARDS Cohort

Chen Yun Goh, Wen Cong Lee, Herng Lee Tan, Yi-Jyun Ma, Apollo Bugarin Aguilan, Judith Ju Ming Wong, Cheng Si Ong
article en

Abstract

Background: There is limited data regarding mechanical ventilation practices in overweight patients with PARDS. Our study aims to understand the differences in ventilator management and its effect on clinical outcomes in overweight and non-overweight PARDS patients. We hypothesize that the use of PEEP had a differential effect on overweight vs non-overweight PARDS patients. Methods: This study analyzed patients recruited based on the PALICC 2015 definition of PARDS. Correlation between ventilator settings and BMI Z-score were studied using Spearman correlation. Overweight status was defined as BMI Z-score ≥ +1. Ventilator settings were analyzed in overweight vs. non-overweight groups and the association between PEEP with PICU mortality and 28-day ventilator free days was studied using multivariable regression, adjusting for age and oxygenation index and stratified by overweight status Results: 132 patients with PARDS were included in this study. There were no clinical or statistical differences in ventilator settings comparing overweight vs non-overweight patients, though there was a trend towards the use of higher PEEP with patients of higher BMI Z-scores (r = 0.19, P = .056). Among patients who were not overweight, there was a significant difference in mortality comparing patients who were adherent vs. not adherent to the PEEP/FIO2 grid [0 (0%), vs 9 (17.5%); P = .053], however, this effect was missing in the overweight group. Similarly, VFD was also improved comparing patients who were adherent vs. not adherent [21 (18.5, 23) vs. 15 (0, 21); P = .007] only in the non-overweight group. In the multivariable analysis, adherence to the PEEP/FIO2 grid was only associated with improved VFD [adjusted beta 6.05 (95% confidence interval 0.43, 11.66); P = .035] in non-overweight patients. Conclusions: The beneficial effects of the PEEP/FIO2 grid were only observed in non-overweight patients. A larger cohort is required to confirm these findings and to determine the mechanism of this effect.

Respiratory CareVol. 69(10_suppl)
KK Women's and Children's Hospital (SG), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.