Role of spinal sensorimotor circuits in triphasic muscle command: a simulation approach using goal exploration process

During rapid voluntary elbow movement on horizontal plane, a stereotyped triphasic pattern is typically observed in the electromyograms (EMGs) of antagonistic muscles acting at this joint. To explain the origin of such triphasic commands, two types of theories have been proposed. Peripheral theories consider that triphasic commands result from sensorimotor spinal networks, either through a combination of reflexes or through a spinal central pattern generator. Central theories consider that the triphasic command is elaborated in the brain. Although both theories were partially supported by physiological data, there is still no consensus about how exactly triphasic commands are elaborated. Moreover, capacities of simple spinal sensorimotor circuits to elaborate triphasic commands on their own have not been tested yet. In order to test this, we modelled arm musculoskeletal system operating in the absence of gravity, muscle activation dynamics, proprioceptive spindle and Golgi afferent activities and spinal sensorimotor circuits. Step commands were designed to modify the activity of spinal neurons and the strength of their synapses, either to prepare (SET) the network before movement onset, or to launch the movement (GO). Since these step commands do not contain any dynamics, changes in muscle activities responsible for arm movement rest entirely upon interactions between the spinal network and the musculoskeletal system. Critically, we selected step commands using a Goal Exploration Process inspired from baby babbling during development. In this task, the Goal Exploration Process proved very efficient at discovering step commands that enabled spinal circuits to handle a broad spectrum of functional behaviors, displayed in a behavioral space characterized by movement amplitude and maximal speed. All over the behavioral space, specific SET and GO commands elicited natural triphasic commands, thereby substantiating the inherent capacity of the spinal network in generating them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2026.1745836
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of spinal sensorimotor circuits in triphasic muscle command: a simulation approach using goal exploration process

Bryce Chung, Aymar de Rugy, Matthieu Guémann, Luca Lemarchand et al.
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Role of spinal sensorimotor circuits in triphasic muscle command: a simulation approach using goal exploration process

Bryce Chung, Aymar de Rugy, Matthieu Guémann, Luca Lemarchand, Pierre-Yves Oudeyer, Florent Paclet, Daniel Cattaert
article en

Abstract

During rapid voluntary elbow movement on horizontal plane, a stereotyped triphasic pattern is typically observed in the electromyograms (EMGs) of antagonistic muscles acting at this joint. To explain the origin of such triphasic commands, two types of theories have been proposed. Peripheral theories consider that triphasic commands result from sensorimotor spinal networks, either through a combination of reflexes or through a spinal central pattern generator. Central theories consider that the triphasic command is elaborated in the brain. Although both theories were partially supported by physiological data, there is still no consensus about how exactly triphasic commands are elaborated. Moreover, capacities of simple spinal sensorimotor circuits to elaborate triphasic commands on their own have not been tested yet. In order to test this, we modelled arm musculoskeletal system operating in the absence of gravity, muscle activation dynamics, proprioceptive spindle and Golgi afferent activities and spinal sensorimotor circuits. Step commands were designed to modify the activity of spinal neurons and the strength of their synapses, either to prepare (SET) the network before movement onset, or to launch the movement (GO). Since these step commands do not contain any dynamics, changes in muscle activities responsible for arm movement rest entirely upon interactions between the spinal network and the musculoskeletal system. Critically, we selected step commands using a Goal Exploration Process inspired from baby babbling during development. In this task, the Goal Exploration Process proved very efficient at discovering step commands that enabled spinal circuits to handle a broad spectrum of functional behaviors, displayed in a behavioral space characterized by movement amplitude and maximal speed. All over the behavioral space, specific SET and GO commands elicited natural triphasic commands, thereby substantiating the inherent capacity of the spinal network in generating them.

Frontiers in Computational NeuroscienceVol. 20
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Georgia State University (US), Institut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d’Aquitaine (FR), Centre Inria de l'université de Bordeaux (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.