Spatial Disparities in Emergency Service Accessibility for Vulnerable Populations in Melbourne: A Voronoi Tessellation Study

Timely emergency department (ED) access is vital for young children under five (U-5) years and adults aged $$\ge $$ 85 years. This study assessed the spatial equity of populations at higher risk of delayed emergency care across Greater Melbourne to identify priority areas for intervention. We integrated 2021 mesh-block demographics with the geolocations of 39 public and private EDs. Using Voronoi tessellation, we defined service catchments and employed 15 km straight-line buffers as proxies for a 15-minute ambulance response range. Of 386,663 children U-5 and adults $$\ge $$ 85 across 46,608 populated mesh blocks, 92.9% lived within 15 km of an ED, while 27,475 (7.1%) individuals lived outside this effective reach. Underserved residents cluster in three peri-urban corridors: Sunbury–Diggers Rest, Little River–Werribee South, and Whittlesea–Kinglake. Five hospitals account for 35% of the groups with elevated emergency healthcare needs caseload. Low-income areas show $$\sim $$ 50% higher odds of being outside the 15 km threshold (9.1% vs 6.0%). Geographic isolation, age-related vulnerability, and socioeconomic disadvantage converge to form critical service gaps. Targeted investments in emergency infrastructure, community paramedicine, and equity-focused urban planning are warranted to ensure prompt, life-saving care for Melbourne’s most at-risk populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spatial Demography
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-026-00159-5
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial Disparities in Emergency Service Accessibility for Vulnerable Populations in Melbourne: A Voronoi Tessellation Study

Mohammad Afzal Khan, David Taniar, Oyelola A. Adegboye, Theophilus I. Emeto et al.
Spatial Demography
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

Spatial Disparities in Emergency Service Accessibility for Vulnerable Populations in Melbourne: A Voronoi Tessellation Study

Mohammad Afzal Khan, David Taniar, Oyelola A. Adegboye, Theophilus I. Emeto, Kiki Maulana Adhinugraha, Shiyang Lyu
article en

Abstract

Timely emergency department (ED) access is vital for young children under five (U-5) years and adults aged $$\ge $$ 85 years. This study assessed the spatial equity of populations at higher risk of delayed emergency care across Greater Melbourne to identify priority areas for intervention. We integrated 2021 mesh-block demographics with the geolocations of 39 public and private EDs. Using Voronoi tessellation, we defined service catchments and employed 15 km straight-line buffers as proxies for a 15-minute ambulance response range. Of 386,663 children U-5 and adults $$\ge $$ 85 across 46,608 populated mesh blocks, 92.9% lived within 15 km of an ED, while 27,475 (7.1%) individuals lived outside this effective reach. Underserved residents cluster in three peri-urban corridors: Sunbury–Diggers Rest, Little River–Werribee South, and Whittlesea–Kinglake. Five hospitals account for 35% of the groups with elevated emergency healthcare needs caseload. Low-income areas show $$\sim $$ 50% higher odds of being outside the 15 km threshold (9.1% vs 6.0%). Geographic isolation, age-related vulnerability, and socioeconomic disadvantage converge to form critical service gaps. Targeted investments in emergency infrastructure, community paramedicine, and equity-focused urban planning are warranted to ensure prompt, life-saving care for Melbourne’s most at-risk populations.

Spatial DemographyVol. 14(1)
La Trobe University (AU), Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine (AU), Charles Darwin University (AU), Monash University (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.