Respiratory-Driven Protocol Survey

Background: In response to the shortage of respiratory therapists, hospitals are seeking different strategies to attract and retain respiratory therapists. The opportunity to practice at the top of one’s professional scope is often cited as being attractive when considering a place of employment. A comprehensive survey explored whether respiratory-driven protocols (mechanical ventilation pathway, asthma, secretion clearance pathway, spinal cord injury) increase job satisfaction and assist with retention or if therapists feel protocols are a workflow burden and decrease job satisfaction. Methods: The survey was conducted at a 700-bed medical center to better understand the impact of protocolized care. The University of Maryland Medical Center’s respiratory therapists were invited to complete a web-based survey via social media and department announcements. IRB approval was obtained. Results: Fifty-three (38%) respiratory therapists responded to the survey from the 139 within the respiratory department. The high agreement rates (94% and 86%) indicate that respiratory protocols significantly increase autonomy and job satisfaction among respiratory therapists. This is a positive outcome as it suggests that the implementation of these protocols has a direct and beneficial impact on the staff. The protocols also increased participation in critical care rounds, with 89% (66% strongly agreed, 23% agreed) stating that it increased the feeling of being part of the critical care team. This finding is particularly important as it demonstrates the role of protocols in fostering a sense of teamwork and collaboration among the staff. Conclusions: Based on this survey feedback, implementing respiratory protocols can increase practice autonomy and job satisfaction within respiratory care departments. Supporting respiratory protocols could also enhance recruitment and retention by increasing respiratory therapists’ pride in being recognized and appreciated for their professional contributions. Ultimately, the facility benefits by filling vacant positions, respiratory therapists see longevity within an organization, and our patients receive the benefits of respiratory care best practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Care
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.20244124452
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Respiratory-Driven Protocol Survey

Maria Madden, CARL SHANHOLTZ, Deborah Linehan, Chris Kircher et al.
1 citations
Respiratory Care
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
0.42
article

Respiratory-Driven Protocol Survey

Maria Madden, CARL SHANHOLTZ, Deborah Linehan, Chris Kircher, Marlin Martin, Martin Nedyalkov, Nichole Bradley, Cheryl Epps, Karen Wockenfuss, Ashleigh Critzos, Tyneisha Gardner, Justin Bernacki, Shawn Craft, Hamid Reza
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: In response to the shortage of respiratory therapists, hospitals are seeking different strategies to attract and retain respiratory therapists. The opportunity to practice at the top of one’s professional scope is often cited as being attractive when considering a place of employment. A comprehensive survey explored whether respiratory-driven protocols (mechanical ventilation pathway, asthma, secretion clearance pathway, spinal cord injury) increase job satisfaction and assist with retention or if therapists feel protocols are a workflow burden and decrease job satisfaction. Methods: The survey was conducted at a 700-bed medical center to better understand the impact of protocolized care. The University of Maryland Medical Center’s respiratory therapists were invited to complete a web-based survey via social media and department announcements. IRB approval was obtained. Results: Fifty-three (38%) respiratory therapists responded to the survey from the 139 within the respiratory department. The high agreement rates (94% and 86%) indicate that respiratory protocols significantly increase autonomy and job satisfaction among respiratory therapists. This is a positive outcome as it suggests that the implementation of these protocols has a direct and beneficial impact on the staff. The protocols also increased participation in critical care rounds, with 89% (66% strongly agreed, 23% agreed) stating that it increased the feeling of being part of the critical care team. This finding is particularly important as it demonstrates the role of protocols in fostering a sense of teamwork and collaboration among the staff. Conclusions: Based on this survey feedback, implementing respiratory protocols can increase practice autonomy and job satisfaction within respiratory care departments. Supporting respiratory protocols could also enhance recruitment and retention by increasing respiratory therapists’ pride in being recognized and appreciated for their professional contributions. Ultimately, the facility benefits by filling vacant positions, respiratory therapists see longevity within an organization, and our patients receive the benefits of respiratory care best practices.

Respiratory CareVol. 69(10_suppl)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
0.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.