Pluralisation and differentiation of employment patterns in five liberal regime countries

Abstract This study examines the standard employment life course among the post‐war generation in five countries traditionally classified as liberal and investigates variations in the pluralisation and differentiation of life course employment patterns within liberal welfare states. Using retrospective data from five liberal‐leaning countries (England, Ireland, Switzerland, the United States, and Chile) we reconstruct men's and women's working trajectories from ages 15 to 65. Our sequence analysis reveals inconsistent levels of pluralisation across these countries but a consistent trend towards greater differentiation. We also find that gender and educational differences do not uniformly account for these patterns. The findings challenge the notion of all‐pervasive standard employment within this generation and demonstrate that even nations sharing similar welfare typologies can produce divergent life course outcomes. We conclude that historical legacies, cultural norms, and market deregulations shape diverse employment pathways, underlining the need for comparative, longitudinal approaches. Implications for comparative research and potential policy levers are discussed cautiously.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Welfare
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.70068
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pluralisation and differentiation of employment patterns in five liberal regime countries

Andrés Biehl, Nicky Le Feuvre, Carlos Budnevich‐Portales, Ariel Azar et al.
International Journal of Social Welfare
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Pluralisation and differentiation of employment patterns in five liberal regime countries

Andrés Biehl, Nicky Le Feuvre, Carlos Budnevich‐Portales, Ariel Azar, Ignacio Cabib, Martina Yopo‐Díaz
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the standard employment life course among the post‐war generation in five countries traditionally classified as liberal and investigates variations in the pluralisation and differentiation of life course employment patterns within liberal welfare states. Using retrospective data from five liberal‐leaning countries (England, Ireland, Switzerland, the United States, and Chile) we reconstruct men's and women's working trajectories from ages 15 to 65. Our sequence analysis reveals inconsistent levels of pluralisation across these countries but a consistent trend towards greater differentiation. We also find that gender and educational differences do not uniformly account for these patterns. The findings challenge the notion of all‐pervasive standard employment within this generation and demonstrate that even nations sharing similar welfare typologies can produce divergent life course outcomes. We conclude that historical legacies, cultural norms, and market deregulations shape diverse employment pathways, underlining the need for comparative, longitudinal approaches. Implications for comparative research and potential policy levers are discussed cautiously.

International Journal of Social WelfareVol. 35(2)
Universidad de Santiago de Chile (CL), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), FORS – Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences (CH), Institute of Social Sciences (RS), University of Chile (CL), University of Lausanne (CH)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.