Who wants to be in the Driver’s seat? Members’ views on intra-party democratic innovations

Intra-party democratic innovations are on the rise around the world and burgeoning strands of research provide an institutional understanding of how political parties approach them. However, we still know little about how party members view democratic innovations and the benefits they can bring to the party. This article addresses this gap in the literature by mapping party members’ views on intra-party democratic innovations, and by identifying the areas where these innovations are welcome. It draws on semi-structured interviews with party members of parliamentary political parties in Romania. The results of our thematic analysis indicate that party members show considerably stronger support for deliberative practices compared to direct democracy. There is broad consensus across parties that deliberation can be used mainly for organization development and as electoral strategies but may be also suitable for internal communication and problem solving. Direct democracy is seen as contributing to organization development and as appropriate for internal communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Party Politics
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688261435193
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who wants to be in the Driver’s seat? Members’ views on intra-party democratic innovations

Claudiu Marian, Sergiu Gherghina
Party Politics
Social Media and Politics
article

Who wants to be in the Driver’s seat? Members’ views on intra-party democratic innovations

Claudiu Marian, Sergiu Gherghina
article en

Abstract

Intra-party democratic innovations are on the rise around the world and burgeoning strands of research provide an institutional understanding of how political parties approach them. However, we still know little about how party members view democratic innovations and the benefits they can bring to the party. This article addresses this gap in the literature by mapping party members’ views on intra-party democratic innovations, and by identifying the areas where these innovations are welcome. It draws on semi-structured interviews with party members of parliamentary political parties in Romania. The results of our thematic analysis indicate that party members show considerably stronger support for deliberative practices compared to direct democracy. There is broad consensus across parties that deliberation can be used mainly for organization development and as electoral strategies but may be also suitable for internal communication and problem solving. Direct democracy is seen as contributing to organization development and as appropriate for internal communication.

Party Politics
Babeș-Bolyai University (RO), University of Glasgow (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.