Integrating fuzzy-based afforestation scenarios and soil and water assessment tool to implement nature-based flood solutions

ABSTRACT Designing nature-based solutions (NBSs) for flood mitigation is inherently complex, requiring careful integration of ecological, hydrological, and spatial considerations. This study presents an integrated approach to evaluate afforestation scenarios for flood reduction by linking a fuzzy land suitability model with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). The fuzzy land suitability model applies a Mamdani approach to classify catchment areas according to their afforestation potential, incorporating hydro-ecological criteria alongside expert judgment. SWAT was calibrated to capture the hydrological response to land-use changes by simulating a long-term hydrological period of the Bremer River catchment, Australia. The following two afforestation scenarios were examined: (1) targeting only highly suitable areas and (2) including both highly and moderately suitable areas. These scenarios were then evaluated for their capacity to reduce flood peaks. Results indicate that SWAT accurately reproduced observed flood dynamics, with Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency values exceeding 0.5 for a long-term period. The land suitability assessment highlighted that areas classified as highly suitable are limited, implying that moderately suitable regions may need to be considered to achieve meaningful flood mitigation. The study further demonstrates that afforestation can reduce flood peaks by up to 18%, though large-scale implementation may face practical and technical limitations across the catchment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blue-Green Systems
Published
2026-02-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2166/bgs.2026.039
Primary Topic
Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating fuzzy-based afforestation scenarios and soil and water assessment tool to implement nature-based flood solutions

Barry Croke, Roslyn Tamara Prinsley, Mahdi Sedighkia
Blue-Green Systems
Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
article

Integrating fuzzy-based afforestation scenarios and soil and water assessment tool to implement nature-based flood solutions

Barry Croke, Roslyn Tamara Prinsley, Mahdi Sedighkia
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Designing nature-based solutions (NBSs) for flood mitigation is inherently complex, requiring careful integration of ecological, hydrological, and spatial considerations. This study presents an integrated approach to evaluate afforestation scenarios for flood reduction by linking a fuzzy land suitability model with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). The fuzzy land suitability model applies a Mamdani approach to classify catchment areas according to their afforestation potential, incorporating hydro-ecological criteria alongside expert judgment. SWAT was calibrated to capture the hydrological response to land-use changes by simulating a long-term hydrological period of the Bremer River catchment, Australia. The following two afforestation scenarios were examined: (1) targeting only highly suitable areas and (2) including both highly and moderately suitable areas. These scenarios were then evaluated for their capacity to reduce flood peaks. Results indicate that SWAT accurately reproduced observed flood dynamics, with Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency values exceeding 0.5 for a long-term period. The land suitability assessment highlighted that areas classified as highly suitable are limited, implying that moderately suitable regions may need to be considered to achieve meaningful flood mitigation. The study further demonstrates that afforestation can reduce flood peaks by up to 18%, though large-scale implementation may face practical and technical limitations across the catchment.

Blue-Green SystemsVol. 8(1)
Australian National University (AU)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.