Customer Experience: Heterogeneity Insights From Meta‐Analytic Synthesis

ABSTRACT Overlooking heterogeneity (variability) in customer experience (CX) can lead to incomplete theoretical insights and suboptimal managerial decisions. To address this issue, this article reviews the causes of heterogeneity in extant meta‐analyses of CX research ( n : 91). Guided by Becker and Jaakkola's (2020) classification of CX research, the present review illuminates the moderators (conceptual, contextual, methodological, practical, and temporal) that explain heterogeneity across four clusters of CX research. The “stimuli that affect experiences” cluster displays variation shaped by multiple touchpoints and emerging technologies such as augmented reality and chatbots. The “responses to stimuli” cluster demonstrates that customers' cognitive, emotional, and behavioral experiential responses vary due to cultural and methodological differences. The “evaluative outcomes” cluster highlights satisfaction and loyalty as central outcomes shaped by conceptual and contextual drivers. The “customer contingencies” cluster reveals the moderating influence of cultural dimensions, personal traits, and sustainability considerations. These findings advance the theoretical understanding of variation in CX and create opportunities for refined managerial practice and subsequent research inquiry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Marketing
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.70123
Primary Topic
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Customer Experience: Heterogeneity Insights From Meta‐Analytic Synthesis

Musarrat Shaheen, Tareq Rasul, Raouf Ahmad Rather, Wagner Júnior Ladeira et al.
Psychology and Marketing
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
article

Customer Experience: Heterogeneity Insights From Meta‐Analytic Synthesis

Musarrat Shaheen, Tareq Rasul, Raouf Ahmad Rather, Wagner Júnior Ladeira, Fernando de Oliveira Santini, Weng Marc Lim
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Overlooking heterogeneity (variability) in customer experience (CX) can lead to incomplete theoretical insights and suboptimal managerial decisions. To address this issue, this article reviews the causes of heterogeneity in extant meta‐analyses of CX research ( n : 91). Guided by Becker and Jaakkola's (2020) classification of CX research, the present review illuminates the moderators (conceptual, contextual, methodological, practical, and temporal) that explain heterogeneity across four clusters of CX research. The “stimuli that affect experiences” cluster displays variation shaped by multiple touchpoints and emerging technologies such as augmented reality and chatbots. The “responses to stimuli” cluster demonstrates that customers' cognitive, emotional, and behavioral experiential responses vary due to cultural and methodological differences. The “evaluative outcomes” cluster highlights satisfaction and loyalty as central outcomes shaped by conceptual and contextual drivers. The “customer contingencies” cluster reveals the moderating influence of cultural dimensions, personal traits, and sustainability considerations. These findings advance the theoretical understanding of variation in CX and create opportunities for refined managerial practice and subsequent research inquiry.

Psychology and Marketing
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), Institute of Management Technology (IN), Gulf University for Science & Technology (KW), Jaipuria Institute of Management (IN), Korea University (JP), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Arizona State University (US), Swinburne University of Technology (AU), Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (BR), Sunway University (MY), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.