Algorithms for Claims Trading

Understanding and mitigating systemic risk is an important ongoing challenge in financial networks. We study an approach to rescue a bank in distress based on the idea of claims trading , a notion defined in Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. We formalize the idea in the context of the seminal model of financial networks by Eisenberg and Noe [9]. Given two banks v and w , we consider the operation that w takes over some claims of v and in return gives liquidity to v (or creditors of v ) to ultimately rescue v (or mitigate contagion effects). We study structural properties and computational complexity of decision and optimization problems arising from this trading operation. When trading claims for which v is the creditor, we show that there is no trade in which both banks v and w strictly improve their assets. While deciding the existence of a trade, in which v profits strictly and w remains indifferent, can be NP -hard, we provide FPTAS’es to approximate such a trade, even when banks settle their debt using general monotone payment functions. When trading claims with a common debtor, we show positive and negative results that crucially depend on the payment functions.

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Computation Theory
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3801151
Primary Topic
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithms for Claims Trading

ACM Transactions on Computation Theory
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
article

Algorithms for Claims Trading

article en

Abstract

Understanding and mitigating systemic risk is an important ongoing challenge in financial networks. We study an approach to rescue a bank in distress based on the idea of claims trading , a notion defined in Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. We formalize the idea in the context of the seminal model of financial networks by Eisenberg and Noe [9]. Given two banks v and w , we consider the operation that w takes over some claims of v and in return gives liquidity to v (or creditors of v ) to ultimately rescue v (or mitigate contagion effects). We study structural properties and computational complexity of decision and optimization problems arising from this trading operation. When trading claims for which v is the creditor, we show that there is no trade in which both banks v and w strictly improve their assets. While deciding the existence of a trade, in which v profits strictly and w remains indifferent, can be NP -hard, we provide FPTAS’es to approximate such a trade, even when banks settle their debt using general monotone payment functions. When trading claims with a common debtor, we show positive and negative results that crucially depend on the payment functions.

ACM Transactions on Computation Theory
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Risk and Portfolio Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.