Infectious disease modeling for public health practice: projections, scenarios, and uncertainty in three phases of outbreak response

Public health departments need evidence-backed scenario projections to support decision making in infectious disease outbreaks. However, traditional infectious disease models are often not readily deployable or responsive to the urgent questions and priorities of public health departments or health systems. Moreover, uncertainty in model outputs is not always adequately assessed or communicated, potentially undermining trust among public health practitioners and the public. To address these issues, we, the Insight Net Modeling Guidance for Public Health Working Group, used early COVID-19 data from Michigan to illustrate modeling approaches that can be used to answer urgent questions in three key phases of outbreak response: prior to local introduction, early exponential growth, and established transmission with potential interventions. In each phase, we integrate case, hospitalization, and death data and capture ranges of plausible future trajectories. These models, which produce status quo and scenario projections, are intended to inform planning and motivate action rather than forecast precise future outcomes. Importantly, this work offers guidance to focus modeling efforts and provides examples and code for how to fit and implement these models, ultimately serving as both a conceptual guide and practical toolkit to support more transparent, timely, and appropriate use of models in outbreak response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwag058
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Infectious disease modeling for public health practice: projections, scenarios, and uncertainty in three phases of outbreak response

Andrew F. Brouwer, Philip Huang, Lior Rennert, Marisa C. Eisenberg et al.
American Journal of Epidemiology
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
article

Infectious disease modeling for public health practice: projections, scenarios, and uncertainty in three phases of outbreak response

Andrew F. Brouwer, Philip Huang, Lior Rennert, Marisa C. Eisenberg, Natalie E. Dean, Harry Hochheiser, Joseph Coyle
article en

Abstract

Public health departments need evidence-backed scenario projections to support decision making in infectious disease outbreaks. However, traditional infectious disease models are often not readily deployable or responsive to the urgent questions and priorities of public health departments or health systems. Moreover, uncertainty in model outputs is not always adequately assessed or communicated, potentially undermining trust among public health practitioners and the public. To address these issues, we, the Insight Net Modeling Guidance for Public Health Working Group, used early COVID-19 data from Michigan to illustrate modeling approaches that can be used to answer urgent questions in three key phases of outbreak response: prior to local introduction, early exponential growth, and established transmission with potential interventions. In each phase, we integrate case, hospitalization, and death data and capture ranges of plausible future trajectories. These models, which produce status quo and scenario projections, are intended to inform planning and motivate action rather than forecast precise future outcomes. Importantly, this work offers guidance to focus modeling efforts and provides examples and code for how to fit and implement these models, ultimately serving as both a conceptual guide and practical toolkit to support more transparent, timely, and appropriate use of models in outbreak response.

American Journal of Epidemiology
Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (US), Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy (US), Emory University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of Michigan (US), Dallas County (US), Michigan Center for Translational Pathology (US), Clemson University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.