TikTok and Bilibili as sources of palliative care information: an analysis of quality and reliability

The development and popularization of palliative care have garnered significant attention. Short-video platforms TikTok and Bilibili boast vast audiences, enabling users to readily access related information. However, the quality of palliative care content available on these platforms remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the quality and reliability of Chinese-language palliative care-related short videos on the TikTok and Bilibili video-sharing platforms. We selected the top 100 Chinese-language palliative care videos from Bilibili and TikTok based on comprehensive rankings, categorizing them by source and content. Three scoring tools—Global Quality Score (GQS), JAMA, and modified mDISCERN—were used to evaluate video quality and reliability. The 200 videos included in this study primarily originated from five sources: individual creators (n = 79, 39.5%), healthcare practitioners (n = 64, 32%), news media (n = 28, 14%), for-profit organizations (n = 15, 7.5%), and non-profit organizations (n = 14, 7%). Based on content, videos were categorized into six themes: relevant concepts (n = 98, 49%), practice examples (n = 85, 42.5%), life education (n = 74, 37%), specific service details (n = 71, 35.5%), industry status (n = 45, 22.5%), and future outlook (n = 25, 12.5%). Regarding video quality and reliability, palliative care-related content on TikTok and Bilibili demonstrated lower quality. TikTok’s median GQS, JAMA, and mDISCERN scores were 2.00, 1.00, and 2.00, respectively, while Bilibili’s median scores for these metrics were 3.00, 2.00, and 2.00. Videos posted by healthcare professionals scored significantly higher on GQS (p < 0.05), mDISCERN (p < 0.01), and JAMA (p < 0.05) compared to non-professionals. Likes, shares, and comments showed a weak positive correlation with video quality, while likes and comments exhibited a weak negative correlation with video duration. This study found that the number of Chinese-language palliative care videos on TikTok and Bilibili is limited, with generally low quality and reliability. Videos posted by healthcare professionals demonstrated higher quality and reliability. Content-wise, these videos effectively conveyed basic palliative care concepts to the public, aiding in the dissemination of life education. Future efforts should encourage healthcare professionals to produce more high-quality video content to promote public awareness of palliative care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Palliative Care
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02051-x
Primary Topic
Social Media in Health Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TikTok and Bilibili as sources of palliative care information: an analysis of quality and reliability

Yang Li, Shaojuan Feng, Chao Yan, Ruoyue Zhou et al.
BMC Palliative Care
Social Media in Health Education
article

TikTok and Bilibili as sources of palliative care information: an analysis of quality and reliability

Yang Li, Shaojuan Feng, Chao Yan, Ruoyue Zhou, Cheng Xu
article en

Abstract

The development and popularization of palliative care have garnered significant attention. Short-video platforms TikTok and Bilibili boast vast audiences, enabling users to readily access related information. However, the quality of palliative care content available on these platforms remains uncertain. This study aims to evaluate the quality and reliability of Chinese-language palliative care-related short videos on the TikTok and Bilibili video-sharing platforms. We selected the top 100 Chinese-language palliative care videos from Bilibili and TikTok based on comprehensive rankings, categorizing them by source and content. Three scoring tools—Global Quality Score (GQS), JAMA, and modified mDISCERN—were used to evaluate video quality and reliability. The 200 videos included in this study primarily originated from five sources: individual creators (n = 79, 39.5%), healthcare practitioners (n = 64, 32%), news media (n = 28, 14%), for-profit organizations (n = 15, 7.5%), and non-profit organizations (n = 14, 7%). Based on content, videos were categorized into six themes: relevant concepts (n = 98, 49%), practice examples (n = 85, 42.5%), life education (n = 74, 37%), specific service details (n = 71, 35.5%), industry status (n = 45, 22.5%), and future outlook (n = 25, 12.5%). Regarding video quality and reliability, palliative care-related content on TikTok and Bilibili demonstrated lower quality. TikTok’s median GQS, JAMA, and mDISCERN scores were 2.00, 1.00, and 2.00, respectively, while Bilibili’s median scores for these metrics were 3.00, 2.00, and 2.00. Videos posted by healthcare professionals scored significantly higher on GQS (p < 0.05), mDISCERN (p < 0.01), and JAMA (p < 0.05) compared to non-professionals. Likes, shares, and comments showed a weak positive correlation with video quality, while likes and comments exhibited a weak negative correlation with video duration. This study found that the number of Chinese-language palliative care videos on TikTok and Bilibili is limited, with generally low quality and reliability. Videos posted by healthcare professionals demonstrated higher quality and reliability. Content-wise, these videos effectively conveyed basic palliative care concepts to the public, aiding in the dissemination of life education. Future efforts should encourage healthcare professionals to produce more high-quality video content to promote public awareness of palliative care.

BMC Palliative Care
Zunyi Medical University (CN), First People’s Hospital of Zunyi (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Social Media in Health Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.