Social hierarchy influences monkeys’ risky decisions

Primates' decision-making in economic contexts follows distinctive patterns, as initially described by Prospect Theory. Social animals, such as monkeys, live in hierarchically structured groups where individual status may influence cognitive processes, including economic decisions. We leveraged a unique dataset from a semi-free ranging macaques' group, which had continuous access to gambling tasks over several years, yielding hundreds of thousands of trials and longitudinal assessments of social hierarchy. Our findings reveal a dynamic relationship between social hierarchy and decision parameters: middle-ranking individuals displayed reduced risk aversion for potential gains but not losses. Longitudinal analyses suggested that changes in social rank were followed by corresponding shifts in risk attitudes, implying that social position, rather than inherent traits, influences decision-making patterns. While sex had no significant impact, age was primarily associated with variations in loss aversion. These results underscore the flexibility and adaptive nature of primates' cognitive biases and provide key insights into how social structures influence risk behavior, with potential implications for understanding decision-making processes in other social species, including humans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09817-2
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social hierarchy influences monkeys’ risky decisions

Thomas Boraud, Naomi Chaix-Eichel, Sébastien Ballesta, Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde et al.
Communications Biology
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Social hierarchy influences monkeys’ risky decisions

Thomas Boraud, Naomi Chaix-Eichel, Sébastien Ballesta, Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde, Ayrton Guerillon, Nicolas P. Rougier
article en

Abstract

Primates' decision-making in economic contexts follows distinctive patterns, as initially described by Prospect Theory. Social animals, such as monkeys, live in hierarchically structured groups where individual status may influence cognitive processes, including economic decisions. We leveraged a unique dataset from a semi-free ranging macaques' group, which had continuous access to gambling tasks over several years, yielding hundreds of thousands of trials and longitudinal assessments of social hierarchy. Our findings reveal a dynamic relationship between social hierarchy and decision parameters: middle-ranking individuals displayed reduced risk aversion for potential gains but not losses. Longitudinal analyses suggested that changes in social rank were followed by corresponding shifts in risk attitudes, implying that social position, rather than inherent traits, influences decision-making patterns. While sex had no significant impact, age was primarily associated with variations in loss aversion. These results underscore the flexibility and adaptive nature of primates' cognitive biases and provide key insights into how social structures influence risk behavior, with potential implications for understanding decision-making processes in other social species, including humans.

Communications Biology
Université Paris-Panthéon-Assas (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR), Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives (FR), Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Adaptatives (FR), Institut Jean Nicod (FR), Laboratoire Bordelais de Recherche en Informatique (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR), Université de Strasbourg (FR), University of Haifa (IL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.