Age differences in innovation strategies: Children favour exploration and adults prefer exploitation

Innovation plays a fundamental role in human cognitive development, yet the mechanisms by which it emerges in childhood are complex. Innovation abilities appear to emerge around age eight years, critiques of experimental work investigating innovation in children highlight issues with research designs being ill-structured and using a single trial, with a time limit and one dominant solution. This study examined children's and adults' problem-solving abilities in two tasks: the Hook Task, a well-established measure of innovation with a single dominant solution, and the Tub Transfer Task, which offers multiple possible solutions across six trials. We found that the Tub Transfer Task was easier for children to complete relative to the Hook Task, children successfully completed this task from 5 years, 7 months old. Moreover, children and adults approached the Tub Transfer Task differently. As well as preferring different types of strategy, children explored a range of different approaches over the six trials of the Tub Transfer Task whereas adults were more likely to exploit a single approach. This study highlights the differences in problem-solving approaches between children and adults and demonstrates young children are able to innovate on simple tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106573
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Age differences in innovation strategies: Children favour exploration and adults prefer exploitation

Katherine A. Driver, Lucy Cragg, Emily Rachel Reed Burdett
Acta Psychologica
Child and Animal Learning Development
article

Age differences in innovation strategies: Children favour exploration and adults prefer exploitation

Katherine A. Driver, Lucy Cragg, Emily Rachel Reed Burdett
article en

Abstract

Innovation plays a fundamental role in human cognitive development, yet the mechanisms by which it emerges in childhood are complex. Innovation abilities appear to emerge around age eight years, critiques of experimental work investigating innovation in children highlight issues with research designs being ill-structured and using a single trial, with a time limit and one dominant solution. This study examined children's and adults' problem-solving abilities in two tasks: the Hook Task, a well-established measure of innovation with a single dominant solution, and the Tub Transfer Task, which offers multiple possible solutions across six trials. We found that the Tub Transfer Task was easier for children to complete relative to the Hook Task, children successfully completed this task from 5 years, 7 months old. Moreover, children and adults approached the Tub Transfer Task differently. As well as preferring different types of strategy, children explored a range of different approaches over the six trials of the Tub Transfer Task whereas adults were more likely to exploit a single approach. This study highlights the differences in problem-solving approaches between children and adults and demonstrates young children are able to innovate on simple tasks.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 265
University of Nottingham (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Child and Animal Learning Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.