Racial Differences in Time at Work Not Working: Rejoinder

Hamermesh, Genadek, and Burda (HGB) ( ILR Review 2021) found that Black and non-Black Hispanic workers spent more time at work, not working, compared to Whites. They argued that observed racial gaps in earnings might be explained by racial disparities in time at work and not working. Darity, Hamilton, Myers, Price, and Xu (DHMPX) ( ILR Review 2021), noting the sensitivity of these results to structural form, responded and argued that Oaxaca decompositions reveal no sizeable racial differences in time at work not working. Hamermesh, Genadek, and Burda’s response (HGB-II) ( ILR Review 2022) claimed that the techniques used by DHMPX are outdated. This rejoinder provides a robust defense of the decomposition techniques applied in DHMPX but also includes new Gelbach decompositions using individual microdata. Estimates in this article confirm that time use choices do not explain the observed racial earnings gap.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Published
2026-03-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939261425247
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial Differences in Time at Work Not Working: Rejoinder

Gregory N. Price, Darrick Hamilton, William Darity, Man Xu et al.
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

Racial Differences in Time at Work Not Working: Rejoinder

Gregory N. Price, Darrick Hamilton, William Darity, Man Xu, Thomas Durfee, Samuel L. Myers
article en

Abstract

Hamermesh, Genadek, and Burda (HGB) ( ILR Review 2021) found that Black and non-Black Hispanic workers spent more time at work, not working, compared to Whites. They argued that observed racial gaps in earnings might be explained by racial disparities in time at work and not working. Darity, Hamilton, Myers, Price, and Xu (DHMPX) ( ILR Review 2021), noting the sensitivity of these results to structural form, responded and argued that Oaxaca decompositions reveal no sizeable racial differences in time at work not working. Hamermesh, Genadek, and Burda’s response (HGB-II) ( ILR Review 2022) claimed that the techniques used by DHMPX are outdated. This rejoinder provides a robust defense of the decomposition techniques applied in DHMPX but also includes new Gelbach decompositions using individual microdata. Estimates in this article confirm that time use choices do not explain the observed racial earnings gap.

Industrial and Labor Relations Review
University of Macau (MO), Center For Policy Research (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.