Clinical Outcomes and Pathogen-Based Prognostic Stratification in Rare Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infections: A Pooled Narrative Synthesis of Author-Derived Literature

Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related infections caused by rare pathogens are heterogeneous and clinically challenging, and available evidence is largely limited to isolated reports that hinder comparative interpretation. We conducted a controlled pooled narrative synthesis with exploratory comparative analyses of previously published, author-derived literature, designed to compare clinical outcomes across rare pathogen groups using a consistent analytical framework rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis. Infectious episodes were categorized into four groups: Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) and fungal pathogens (Aspergillus spp.). Primary outcomes were catheter removal and infection-related mortality, while secondary outcomes were analyzed descriptively. In total, 135 infectious episodes were included (17 Gram-positive, 39 Gram-negative, 25 NTM and 55 Aspergillus). Catheter removal occurred in 11.8% of Gram-positive, 12.8% of Gram-negative, 95.8% of NTM and 85.5% of Aspergillus infections, while infection-related mortality was observed only in NTM (4.0%) and Aspergillus infections (38.2%). Exploratory comparisons suggested a gradient of severity across pathogen categories. In conclusion, rare PD pathogens show distinct, pathogen-specific outcome patterns. Rather than a validated prognostic model, we propose descriptive, hypothesis-generating pathogen-based severity tiers that may support early risk appraisal, guide timely decisions regarding catheter salvage versus early removal, and facilitate more tailored, pathogen-informed management in high-risk infections.