German rehabilitation after total hip or knee arthroplasty through Dutch eyes: a qualitative focus group pilot study

This study aimed to learn from the experiences of patients who have undergone medical rehabilitation following hip or knee arthroplasty in the Netherlands and Germany. A qualitative focus group study was conducted among Dutch revision total hip and knee arthroplasty patients who had experience with initial rehabilitation in the Netherlands plus inpatient rehabilitation in Germany as part of the ‘Common Care’ pilot project. The focus group was recorded, transcribed verbatim and pseudonymised. A thematic analysis using an inductive approach was performed. Five patients and two family members joined the focus group. Analysis revealed five themes: language, location, therapy content, outcomes and structure. Content-wise, therapy, outcomes and structure of rehabilitation in Germany were perceived as more beneficial. In terms of location and language, patients favoured the Dutch approach. Participants generally expressed higher levels of satisfaction with the German rehabilitation trajectory versus the Dutch. The German approach’s main advantages were the more extensive therapy content and supervision plus a feeling of faster recovery, the Dutch were the home-sweet-home feeling, language and travel distance. Future research should further evaluate effects of rehabilitation policies especially on return to work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Research Notes
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-026-07763-0
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

German rehabilitation after total hip or knee arthroplasty through Dutch eyes: a qualitative focus group pilot study

Manna Alma, Gesine H. Seeber, Yvet Mooiweer, Sophie Thölken et al.
BMC Research Notes
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

German rehabilitation after total hip or knee arthroplasty through Dutch eyes: a qualitative focus group pilot study

Manna Alma, Gesine H. Seeber, Yvet Mooiweer, Sophie Thölken, Annemiek Kuipers, Mike Keasberry, Martin Stevens
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to learn from the experiences of patients who have undergone medical rehabilitation following hip or knee arthroplasty in the Netherlands and Germany. A qualitative focus group study was conducted among Dutch revision total hip and knee arthroplasty patients who had experience with initial rehabilitation in the Netherlands plus inpatient rehabilitation in Germany as part of the ‘Common Care’ pilot project. The focus group was recorded, transcribed verbatim and pseudonymised. A thematic analysis using an inductive approach was performed. Five patients and two family members joined the focus group. Analysis revealed five themes: language, location, therapy content, outcomes and structure. Content-wise, therapy, outcomes and structure of rehabilitation in Germany were perceived as more beneficial. In terms of location and language, patients favoured the Dutch approach. Participants generally expressed higher levels of satisfaction with the German rehabilitation trajectory versus the Dutch. The German approach’s main advantages were the more extensive therapy content and supervision plus a feeling of faster recovery, the Dutch were the home-sweet-home feeling, language and travel distance. Future research should further evaluate effects of rehabilitation policies especially on return to work.

BMC Research Notes
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of Groningen (NL), Pius Hospital Oldenburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.