Collaboration at the intersection of domestic and family violence and child protection: Enablers and barriers

• Collaboration is hindered by conflicting paradigms, crisis-driven service delivery, and lack of shared decision-making, compounded by systemic issues like high workloads and underreported DFV. • Co-located, cross-sector roles enhance collaboration between DFV services and child protection agencies by improving communication, transparency, and bridging knowledge gaps. • Developing a shared language for risk and safety assessments aligns DFV and child protection perspectives, enabling structured case discussions that reduce victim-blaming and empower non-offending parents • Strengthening collaboration requires policies mandating joint decision-making, cross-training, adequate funding, and trauma-informed approaches that integrate DFV expertise into child protection. Collaboration between statutory child protection and domestic family violence agencies has been identified as best practice to ensure that men who use violence are visible, and women and children are safe when the violence results in child protection concerns. This paper articulates enablers and barriers that emerged from a research project that tested a co-designed collaborative service model at the intersection of child protection and domestic and family violence in [jurisdiction]. The research was conducted between August 2019 and September 2021. Examination of the enablers and barriers were identified using multiple data sources including case discussions, case file reviews, and working group deliberations. Analysis of the data identified that the Specialist Liaison Officer (SLO) was instrumental in enhancing communication, integrating the key elements of the collaborative service model, and nurturing of professional alliances. However, differences of underlying conceptual and ideological paradigms, service mandates and unilateral decision-making processes driven by legislation significantly impeded effective collaborative service approaches. Domestic and Family Violence (DFV) is a significant issue for most families who are involved with child protection services and therefore building organisational capacity, shared understanding of practice and professional alliances across these complex service sectors is deserving of investment and further research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children and Youth Services Review
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108885
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaboration at the intersection of domestic and family violence and child protection: Enablers and barriers

Amy Rose Bromley, Sarah Wendt, Carmela Bastian
Children and Youth Services Review
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Collaboration at the intersection of domestic and family violence and child protection: Enablers and barriers

Amy Rose Bromley, Sarah Wendt, Carmela Bastian
article en

Abstract

• Collaboration is hindered by conflicting paradigms, crisis-driven service delivery, and lack of shared decision-making, compounded by systemic issues like high workloads and underreported DFV. • Co-located, cross-sector roles enhance collaboration between DFV services and child protection agencies by improving communication, transparency, and bridging knowledge gaps. • Developing a shared language for risk and safety assessments aligns DFV and child protection perspectives, enabling structured case discussions that reduce victim-blaming and empower non-offending parents • Strengthening collaboration requires policies mandating joint decision-making, cross-training, adequate funding, and trauma-informed approaches that integrate DFV expertise into child protection. Collaboration between statutory child protection and domestic family violence agencies has been identified as best practice to ensure that men who use violence are visible, and women and children are safe when the violence results in child protection concerns. This paper articulates enablers and barriers that emerged from a research project that tested a co-designed collaborative service model at the intersection of child protection and domestic and family violence in [jurisdiction]. The research was conducted between August 2019 and September 2021. Examination of the enablers and barriers were identified using multiple data sources including case discussions, case file reviews, and working group deliberations. Analysis of the data identified that the Specialist Liaison Officer (SLO) was instrumental in enhancing communication, integrating the key elements of the collaborative service model, and nurturing of professional alliances. However, differences of underlying conceptual and ideological paradigms, service mandates and unilateral decision-making processes driven by legislation significantly impeded effective collaborative service approaches. Domestic and Family Violence (DFV) is a significant issue for most families who are involved with child protection services and therefore building organisational capacity, shared understanding of practice and professional alliances across these complex service sectors is deserving of investment and further research.

Children and Youth Services ReviewVol. 184
Flinders University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.