Policy termination revisited: theories, processes, and political dynamics

Abstract This article revisits the concept of policy termination, a largely overlooked yet critical phase in the policy process. While early policy cycle models included termination as a distinct stage, contemporary frameworks often omit it, reflecting its marginalization in policy scholarship. This article argues for the renewed relevance of policy termination, distinguishing it from related concepts like policy dismantling, and framing it as a specific form of policy change—namely, cessation. Drawing on foundational and contemporary literature, the article explores the conditions under which termination occurs, the actors and coalitions involved, the role of institutions and ideas, and the feedback effects that shape both the process and aftermath of termination. It highlights the inherently political nature of termination, emphasizing the influence of ideologies, strategic framing, and institutional constraints. The article also addresses the underexplored post-termination phase, considering the durability of termination decisions and their broader impacts. By integrating insights from policy change theories, the article lays the groundwork for a more robust research agenda on policy termination. It introduces the contributions of a special issue dedicated to advancing this field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy and Society
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puag001
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy termination revisited: theories, processes, and political dynamics

Frank L. K. Ohemeng, Vandna Bhatia, Carsten Daugbjerg
Policy and Society
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

Policy termination revisited: theories, processes, and political dynamics

Frank L. K. Ohemeng, Vandna Bhatia, Carsten Daugbjerg
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article revisits the concept of policy termination, a largely overlooked yet critical phase in the policy process. While early policy cycle models included termination as a distinct stage, contemporary frameworks often omit it, reflecting its marginalization in policy scholarship. This article argues for the renewed relevance of policy termination, distinguishing it from related concepts like policy dismantling, and framing it as a specific form of policy change—namely, cessation. Drawing on foundational and contemporary literature, the article explores the conditions under which termination occurs, the actors and coalitions involved, the role of institutions and ideas, and the feedback effects that shape both the process and aftermath of termination. It highlights the inherently political nature of termination, emphasizing the influence of ideologies, strategic framing, and institutional constraints. The article also addresses the underexplored post-termination phase, considering the durability of termination decisions and their broader impacts. By integrating insights from policy change theories, the article lays the groundwork for a more robust research agenda on policy termination. It introduces the contributions of a special issue dedicated to advancing this field.

Policy and SocietyVol. 45(2)
Australian National University (AU), University of Copenhagen (DK), Carleton College (US), Concordia University (US), Carleton University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.