Classification of ordinary chondrites using Mössbauer spectroscopy: Introduction of a new criterion to the 4M method

Abstract The paper presents a modified version of the 4M method, which is the latest method of classifying ordinary chondrites, based on their Mössbauer spectra measured at room temperature. The proposed changes, including the introduction of a new criterion for assessing which group (H, L, or LL) the meteorite being tested belong to, are expected to improve the plausibility of classification by the 4M method. The modification makes use of the Bayesian analysis and the maximum a posteriori probability. This modified version of the 4M method was tested by attempting to classify 20 samples of ordinary chondrites: 8 of type H, 7 of type L, and 5 of type LL. The results were compared with those obtained by the classical method of ordinary chondrite classification. The vast majority of classification tests performed using the new version of the 4M method were consistent with the classical method for group assignment, except for one L‐type sample that was classified differently. It was also shown that the introduction of a new criterion resulted in a significantly better agreement with the established classification than in the case of the level of similarity criterion used in the previous version of the 4M method.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Meteoritics and Planetary Science
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.70122
Primary Topic
Astro and Planetary Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification of ordinary chondrites using Mössbauer spectroscopy: Introduction of a new criterion to the 4M method

Marek Woźniak, A. Grabias, K. Brzózka, Martyna Jakubowska et al.
Meteoritics and Planetary Science
Astro and Planetary Science
article

Classification of ordinary chondrites using Mössbauer spectroscopy: Introduction of a new criterion to the 4M method

Marek Woźniak, A. Grabias, K. Brzózka, Martyna Jakubowska, Krzysztof Szopa, Barbora Pospíšilová, Jolanta Gałązka‐Friedman
article en

Abstract

Abstract The paper presents a modified version of the 4M method, which is the latest method of classifying ordinary chondrites, based on their Mössbauer spectra measured at room temperature. The proposed changes, including the introduction of a new criterion for assessing which group (H, L, or LL) the meteorite being tested belong to, are expected to improve the plausibility of classification by the 4M method. The modification makes use of the Bayesian analysis and the maximum a posteriori probability. This modified version of the 4M method was tested by attempting to classify 20 samples of ordinary chondrites: 8 of type H, 7 of type L, and 5 of type LL. The results were compared with those obtained by the classical method of ordinary chondrite classification. The vast majority of classification tests performed using the new version of the 4M method were consistent with the classical method for group assignment, except for one L‐type sample that was classified differently. It was also shown that the introduction of a new criterion resulted in a significantly better agreement with the established classification than in the case of the level of similarity criterion used in the previous version of the 4M method.

Meteoritics and Planetary Science
Warsaw University of Technology (PL), Kazimierz Pułaski University of Technology and Humanities in Radom (PL), Rejonowe Przedsiębiorstwo Wodociągów i Kanalizacji W Sosnowcu (Poland) (PL), Łukasiewicz Research Network (PL), Humanitas University in Sosnowiec (PL), Institute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health (PL), University of Warsaw (PL), Palacký University Olomouc (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Astro and Planetary Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.