A quantitative definition for poorly soluble particles

Poorly soluble low toxicity particles (PSLT) have long been a concept in particle toxicology and regulatory frameworks addressing inhalation hazards. The term PSLT refers to particles that exhibit low toxicity and minimal solubility in biological fluids, leading to prolonged retention in the lungs and potential overload effects. Historically, PSLT has been used to distinguish materials whose adverse effects are primarily driven by particle burden rather than intrinsic chemical toxicity. While the "low toxicity" (LT) component of the definition has been examined to a certain degree (Driscoll and Borm in Inhal Toxicol 32(2):53-62, 2020), the poorly soluble (PS)-criterion does not yet have a precise definition although it is critically influencing the interpretation of toxicological inhalation repeated dose studies and hazard classifications. An ECETOC Task Force (TF) was formed to define criteria for "poorly soluble" particles (PSPs). This paper presents a quantitative non-animal approach for defining PSP using a model particle, with a focus on its potential to cause volumetric lung overload and affect macrophage clearance mechanisms. The analysis allows to calculate a dissolution rate that would lead to a lung burden of about 1 µL/g of lung tissue (lung overload threshold according to Morrow (Morrow in Fundam Appl Toxicol 10(3):369, 1988)). Below this threshold dissolution rate, this specific model particle would qualify as PSP. In addition, a formula was presented to translate abiotic dissolution rates into biotic (rat) dissolution rates to allow a PS-assessment in an animal-free system. As proof of concept, the TF collected existing in vivo data from member companies, publicly available literature of presumed PS-substances, and reference materials. The collected data revealed that most substances exhibited dissolution rates below the critical threshold and that the lung burden at no observed adverse effect concentrations (NOAECs) remained below the lung overload limit. Importantly, this threshold dissolution rate can differ from particle to particle, depending on factors such as agglomerate density, particle size distribution, and expected concentration. Thus, it should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-026-00670-z
Primary Topic
Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A quantitative definition for poorly soluble particles

Marco Kellert, Shannon M. Krieger, R. V. Battersby, Matthias Hufnagel et al.
Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
article

A quantitative definition for poorly soluble particles

Marco Kellert, Shannon M. Krieger, R. V. Battersby, Matthias Hufnagel, Blanca Serrano Ramón, Helmut Greim, Lan Ma-Hock, Robert Landsiedel, Heidi Stratmann, Bennard van Ravenzwaay, Anthony M. Bowden, David Warheit, Nils Krueger
article en

Abstract

Poorly soluble low toxicity particles (PSLT) have long been a concept in particle toxicology and regulatory frameworks addressing inhalation hazards. The term PSLT refers to particles that exhibit low toxicity and minimal solubility in biological fluids, leading to prolonged retention in the lungs and potential overload effects. Historically, PSLT has been used to distinguish materials whose adverse effects are primarily driven by particle burden rather than intrinsic chemical toxicity. While the "low toxicity" (LT) component of the definition has been examined to a certain degree (Driscoll and Borm in Inhal Toxicol 32(2):53-62, 2020), the poorly soluble (PS)-criterion does not yet have a precise definition although it is critically influencing the interpretation of toxicological inhalation repeated dose studies and hazard classifications. An ECETOC Task Force (TF) was formed to define criteria for "poorly soluble" particles (PSPs). This paper presents a quantitative non-animal approach for defining PSP using a model particle, with a focus on its potential to cause volumetric lung overload and affect macrophage clearance mechanisms. The analysis allows to calculate a dissolution rate that would lead to a lung burden of about 1 µL/g of lung tissue (lung overload threshold according to Morrow (Morrow in Fundam Appl Toxicol 10(3):369, 1988)). Below this threshold dissolution rate, this specific model particle would qualify as PSP. In addition, a formula was presented to translate abiotic dissolution rates into biotic (rat) dissolution rates to allow a PS-assessment in an animal-free system. As proof of concept, the TF collected existing in vivo data from member companies, publicly available literature of presumed PS-substances, and reference materials. The collected data revealed that most substances exhibited dissolution rates below the critical threshold and that the lung burden at no observed adverse effect concentrations (NOAECs) remained below the lung overload limit. Importantly, this threshold dissolution rate can differ from particle to particle, depending on factors such as agglomerate density, particle size distribution, and expected concentration. Thus, it should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Particle and Fibre ToxicologyVol. 23(1)
Unilever (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Bedfordshire (GB), Evonik (Germany) (DE), Wilmington University (US), BASF (United States) (US), European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (BE), BASF (Germany) (DE), Engelhard Arzneimittel (Germany) (DE), Dow Chemical (United States) (US), Allgemeine Gewerbeschule Basel (CH), BH Consulting (Ireland) (IE), Hannover Re (Germany) (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Robert Bosch (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.