Expert elicitation on agricultural enhanced weathering reveals carbon dioxide removal potential and uncertainties in loss pathways

Abstract Enhanced weathering in agriculture is a potential gigatonne-scale carbon dioxide removal (CDR) pathway, but its potential remains difficult to constrain. We used a formal expert elicitation process to estimate CDR potential and efficiency, uncertainties, and key data needs for six feedstocks. Expert opinion of global potential varied by feedstock, with estimates averaging 0.2-0.7 Gt CO2e/yr, but with a wide range (from a source to greater than 5 Gt CO2e/yr removal). When focusing on the American Midwest (pH 5.5-6), carbon dioxide removal efficiency, meaning the fraction of potential ultimately realized, ranged from 27-39%. Key uncertainties included feedstock availability, calcite saturation, and deep soil/freshwater emission pathways. There is a need for empirical data in key stages, with potential to leverage liming data where appropriate. Overall, there appears to be strong potential CDR at broad scales. However, continued research is necessary to build confidence when quantifying that potential and actual removals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03375-5
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert elicitation on agricultural enhanced weathering reveals carbon dioxide removal potential and uncertainties in loss pathways

Sara Vicca, Tom Reershemius, Louis A. Derry, Bonnie G. Waring et al.
Communications Earth & Environment
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Expert elicitation on agricultural enhanced weathering reveals carbon dioxide removal potential and uncertainties in loss pathways

Sara Vicca, Tom Reershemius, Louis A. Derry, Bonnie G. Waring, Yoshiki Kanzaki, Rebecca B. Neumann, Salvatore Calabrese, John A. Higgins, Brian J. Buma, Tyler Kukla, Christiana Dietzen, Ian Malcom Power, Whendee L. Silver, Emily E. Oldfield, S. Zhang, Christopher R. Pearce, Benjamin Z. Houlton, Alexandra Klemme, Tim Jesper Suhrhoff, Doria R. Gordon, Maya Almaraz, Kate Maher, Noah J. Planavsky, M. Granger Morgan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Enhanced weathering in agriculture is a potential gigatonne-scale carbon dioxide removal (CDR) pathway, but its potential remains difficult to constrain. We used a formal expert elicitation process to estimate CDR potential and efficiency, uncertainties, and key data needs for six feedstocks. Expert opinion of global potential varied by feedstock, with estimates averaging 0.2-0.7 Gt CO2e/yr, but with a wide range (from a source to greater than 5 Gt CO2e/yr removal). When focusing on the American Midwest (pH 5.5-6), carbon dioxide removal efficiency, meaning the fraction of potential ultimately realized, ranged from 27-39%. Key uncertainties included feedstock availability, calcite saturation, and deep soil/freshwater emission pathways. There is a need for empirical data in key stages, with potential to leverage liming data where appropriate. Overall, there appears to be strong potential CDR at broad scales. However, continued research is necessary to build confidence when quantifying that potential and actual removals.

Communications Earth & Environment
University of Copenhagen (DK), Environmental Defense Fund (US), Planetary Science Institute (US), Georgia Institute of Technology (US), University of Bremen (DE), National Oceanography Centre (GB), Princeton University (US), University of Washington (US), Cornell University (US), Yale Cancer Center (US), Yale University (US), University of Florida (US), Province of Antwerp (BE), Carbon180 (US), Imperial College London (GB), Trent University (CA), Carnegie Mellon University (US), Newcastle University (GB), Texas A&M University (US), University of California, Berkeley (US), Stanford University (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.