State Recognition of Indigenous Peoples’ Territorial Rights under International Human Rights Law: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Russia

This study analyzes the recognition and protection of indigenous peoples’ territorial rights in Indonesia and Russia within the framework of international human rights law and identifies factors affecting their effectiveness. Using a normative legal method with conceptual and comparative approaches, the study finds that Indonesia has a relatively progressive framework through constitutional recognition of indigenous communities, yet implementation remains weak due to fragmented sectoral regulations and reliance on regional administrative recognition. Russia, by contrast, adopts a centralized model that recognizes only small-numbered indigenous peoples and limits collective ownership and meaningful participation. Both countries face tensions between state sovereignty over natural resources and international obligations to protect indigenous collective rights. The study recommends adopting a multi-level governance model that balances national interests and indigenous autonomy, alongside legal reforms to strengthen implementation of the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) principle, enabling more effective integration of international human rights norms into domestic legal systems..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lampung Journal of International Law
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25041/lajil.v7i2.4904
Primary Topic
Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State Recognition of Indigenous Peoples’ Territorial Rights under International Human Rights Law: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Russia

Kharisma Gemilang, Sri Wahyu Handayani, Sulistiyandari Sulistiyandari, Athari Farhani et al.
Lampung Journal of International Law
Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
article

State Recognition of Indigenous Peoples’ Territorial Rights under International Human Rights Law: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Russia

Kharisma Gemilang, Sri Wahyu Handayani, Sulistiyandari Sulistiyandari, Athari Farhani, Kartono Kartono
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes the recognition and protection of indigenous peoples’ territorial rights in Indonesia and Russia within the framework of international human rights law and identifies factors affecting their effectiveness. Using a normative legal method with conceptual and comparative approaches, the study finds that Indonesia has a relatively progressive framework through constitutional recognition of indigenous communities, yet implementation remains weak due to fragmented sectoral regulations and reliance on regional administrative recognition. Russia, by contrast, adopts a centralized model that recognizes only small-numbered indigenous peoples and limits collective ownership and meaningful participation. Both countries face tensions between state sovereignty over natural resources and international obligations to protect indigenous collective rights. The study recommends adopting a multi-level governance model that balances national interests and indigenous autonomy, alongside legal reforms to strengthen implementation of the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) principle, enabling more effective integration of international human rights norms into domestic legal systems..

Lampung Journal of International LawVol. 7(2)
Jenderal Soedirman University (ID), Institute of Law (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.