Mediating between advocacy and freedom of thought: narrative approaches to a tension in sustainability education

When sustainability is on the agenda, school and education are often assigned a key societal role in providing relevant knowledge and values. However, sustainability advocacy could be problematic when considered against parents’ and children’s formal rights to freedom of thought/belief, creating an ethical tension for teachers. We suggest that classrooms should be pedagogical interspaces and then argue for a narrative ethics approach focusing on utopian visions of sustainable society, without compromising individual agency. Imaginary futures, like fiction, offer to students knowledge of the possibilities to see and preparation for possible scenarios. Narratives also constitute contexts where the individual can expand their perspective, where it may be important to let conflicting narratives clash, allowing for enlarged thought generated in democratic iterations. They also allow students to move between the individual and the planet, from past to the future, and from the human to the more-than-human.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ethics and Education
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2026.2641149
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mediating between advocacy and freedom of thought: narrative approaches to a tension in sustainability education

Ole Andreas Kvamme, Cok Bakker, Christina Osbeck, Olof Franck et al.
Ethics and Education
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Mediating between advocacy and freedom of thought: narrative approaches to a tension in sustainability education

Ole Andreas Kvamme, Cok Bakker, Christina Osbeck, Olof Franck, Karin Sporre, Annika Lilja, Nigel Fancourt
article en

Abstract

When sustainability is on the agenda, school and education are often assigned a key societal role in providing relevant knowledge and values. However, sustainability advocacy could be problematic when considered against parents’ and children’s formal rights to freedom of thought/belief, creating an ethical tension for teachers. We suggest that classrooms should be pedagogical interspaces and then argue for a narrative ethics approach focusing on utopian visions of sustainable society, without compromising individual agency. Imaginary futures, like fiction, offer to students knowledge of the possibilities to see and preparation for possible scenarios. Narratives also constitute contexts where the individual can expand their perspective, where it may be important to let conflicting narratives clash, allowing for enlarged thought generated in democratic iterations. They also allow students to move between the individual and the planet, from past to the future, and from the human to the more-than-human.

Ethics and Education
University of Oslo (NO), Utrecht University (NL), University of Oxford (GB), University of Gothenburg (SE), Umeå University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.