Rock-Paper-Screen: Fifth-graders' comprehension of simple and enhanced digital text

In this experiment, we compared 338 fifth-grade students' comprehension of text presented in three formats: paper, a simple linear digital format, and an enhanced digital format with an embedded dictionary. We also collected data on the students' prior reading comprehension skills, word reading efficiency, and daily digital device use, which allowed us to investigate whether medium effects varied depending on individual differences in reader characteristics. The results revealed no differences in students' text comprehension across the three reading formats. Additionally, there was no indication that performance across reading formats varied depending on students' prior reading skills or digital experience. Although we found no evidence that the embedded dictionary had an impact on students' text comprehension, the process data suggested that students used the dictionary strategically by clicking on words that were central to understanding the ideas presented in the text. Understanding the costs and benefits of on-screen reading is important, as digital reading devices have become integral to social communication and educational activities, increasingly so for younger readers. Although previous research on adults and adolescents commonly reports detrimental effects of screen reading, we found no evidence that tablet reading impaired fifth graders' comprehension of grade-level narrative and expository texts in the classroom. Moreover, while not detrimental, digital text enhancements offered no clear benefit: access to an embedded dictionary had no immediate impact on students' understanding of the texts. These results were consistent across different reading-skill levels. • Fifth graders read texts on paper, tablet, and tablet with an embedded dictionary. • There were no differences in students' comprehension of the texts across formats. • No moderating effects of students' prior reading skills or digital experience • Students used the embedded dictionary strategically.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Learning and Individual Differences
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2026.102896
Primary Topic
Child Development and Digital Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rock-Paper-Screen: Fifth-graders' comprehension of simple and enhanced digital text

Ellen Irén Brinchmann, Johan Braeken
Learning and Individual Differences
Child Development and Digital Technology
article

Rock-Paper-Screen: Fifth-graders' comprehension of simple and enhanced digital text

Ellen Irén Brinchmann, Johan Braeken
article en

Abstract

In this experiment, we compared 338 fifth-grade students' comprehension of text presented in three formats: paper, a simple linear digital format, and an enhanced digital format with an embedded dictionary. We also collected data on the students' prior reading comprehension skills, word reading efficiency, and daily digital device use, which allowed us to investigate whether medium effects varied depending on individual differences in reader characteristics. The results revealed no differences in students' text comprehension across the three reading formats. Additionally, there was no indication that performance across reading formats varied depending on students' prior reading skills or digital experience. Although we found no evidence that the embedded dictionary had an impact on students' text comprehension, the process data suggested that students used the dictionary strategically by clicking on words that were central to understanding the ideas presented in the text. Understanding the costs and benefits of on-screen reading is important, as digital reading devices have become integral to social communication and educational activities, increasingly so for younger readers. Although previous research on adults and adolescents commonly reports detrimental effects of screen reading, we found no evidence that tablet reading impaired fifth graders' comprehension of grade-level narrative and expository texts in the classroom. Moreover, while not detrimental, digital text enhancements offered no clear benefit: access to an embedded dictionary had no immediate impact on students' understanding of the texts. These results were consistent across different reading-skill levels. • Fifth graders read texts on paper, tablet, and tablet with an embedded dictionary. • There were no differences in students' comprehension of the texts across formats. • No moderating effects of students' prior reading skills or digital experience • Students used the embedded dictionary strategically.

Learning and Individual DifferencesVol. 128
University of Oslo (NO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Child Development and Digital Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.