Eye-tracking and visual processing tests for assessing driving ability in individuals with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A pilot study

Changes in visual processing have been found to be affected in the early stages of dementia, potentially limiting driving ability. This pilot study investigated the sensitivity and specificity of eye-tracking, visual processing, and dementia screening tests in evaluating driving abilities among older drivers with and without cognitive impairment. Twenty-three participants aged 65+ years (n = 10 with cognitive impairment, 13 healthy controls) underwent dementia screening assessments including Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT), a Visual Sensitivity Test (VST) and eye-tracking tasks (prosaccade, antisaccade, prospective eye movements) and compared these against a computerised driving-related hazard perception test (HPT) and self-report driving measures. Correlation analyses and ROC curves were used to explore relationships among the outcome measures. Drivers with cognitive impairment did not report different subjective driving performance, but had significantly lower HPT scores, with most scoring below the Driving and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) requirement for licensure. Eye-tracking data (n = 19) showed that drivers with cognitive impairment exhibited greater prosaccade latency variability. Antisaccade latency and prospective eye movement tests both correlated with self-reported in-vehicle task performance. The VST and HVLT tests strongly correlated with HPT scores and were highly predictive of scoring below the HPT DVLA cut-off scores. The VST and HVLT demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for screening poor hazard perception performance in older drivers with cognitive impairment. Impaired eye movements correlated with self-reported difficulties in operating in-vehicle tasks, but not with HPT performance. Further research is needed to verify these findings in on-road assessments and with a larger sample size. • Cognitively impaired drivers show greater variability in prosaccade latency. • Eye-tracking metrics correlate with self-reported in-vehicle task performance, not hazard perception. • Visual processing speed test strongly predicts hazard perception in dementia. • Visual screenings should be integrated into comprehensive assessments of driving.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transport & Health
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2026.102301
Primary Topic
Older Adults Driving Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eye-tracking and visual processing tests for assessing driving ability in individuals with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A pilot study

Diane Gyi, Judith Charlton, Brian Fildes, Jennifer Oxley et al.
Journal of Transport & Health
Older Adults Driving Studies
article

Eye-tracking and visual processing tests for assessing driving ability in individuals with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A pilot study

Diane Gyi, Judith Charlton, Brian Fildes, Jennifer Oxley, Sjaan Koppel, Eef Hogervorst, Andrew Morris, Thomas Wilcockson, Ahmet Begde
article en

Abstract

Changes in visual processing have been found to be affected in the early stages of dementia, potentially limiting driving ability. This pilot study investigated the sensitivity and specificity of eye-tracking, visual processing, and dementia screening tests in evaluating driving abilities among older drivers with and without cognitive impairment. Twenty-three participants aged 65+ years (n = 10 with cognitive impairment, 13 healthy controls) underwent dementia screening assessments including Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT), a Visual Sensitivity Test (VST) and eye-tracking tasks (prosaccade, antisaccade, prospective eye movements) and compared these against a computerised driving-related hazard perception test (HPT) and self-report driving measures. Correlation analyses and ROC curves were used to explore relationships among the outcome measures. Drivers with cognitive impairment did not report different subjective driving performance, but had significantly lower HPT scores, with most scoring below the Driving and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) requirement for licensure. Eye-tracking data (n = 19) showed that drivers with cognitive impairment exhibited greater prosaccade latency variability. Antisaccade latency and prospective eye movement tests both correlated with self-reported in-vehicle task performance. The VST and HVLT tests strongly correlated with HPT scores and were highly predictive of scoring below the HPT DVLA cut-off scores. The VST and HVLT demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for screening poor hazard perception performance in older drivers with cognitive impairment. Impaired eye movements correlated with self-reported difficulties in operating in-vehicle tasks, but not with HPT performance. Further research is needed to verify these findings in on-road assessments and with a larger sample size. • Cognitively impaired drivers show greater variability in prosaccade latency. • Eye-tracking metrics correlate with self-reported in-vehicle task performance, not hazard perception. • Visual processing speed test strongly predicts hazard perception in dementia. • Visual screenings should be integrated into comprehensive assessments of driving.

Journal of Transport & HealthVol. 49
Loughborough University (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Older Adults Driving Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.