Mono- and co-infections of primary porcine respiratory cells with <i>Bordetella bronchiseptica</i> and <i>Streptococcus suis</i> are not affected by the dermonecrotic toxin

<i>Bordetella bronchiseptica</i> is a gram-negative bacterium contributing to respiratory diseases in many different animal species. In the swine population, it occurs frequently and plays a role in the Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex as well as in the pathogenesis of atrophic rhinitis. The dermonecrotic toxin (DNT) is involved in the destruction of the nasal conchae, a hallmark of atrophic rhinitis, and several studies have shown the effects of DNT on osteoblastic cells. Surprisingly, only little is known about the interactions of DNT and respiratory epithelial cells. Thus, we investigated the influence of DNT on porcine respiratory epithelial cells during mono- and co-infections <i>in vitro</i>. For this, we infected porcine precision-cut lung slices and air-liquid interface cultures with a DNT-positive <i>B. bronchiseptica</i> wild-type strain and its isogenic DNT-deficient mutant strain. For co-infection experiments, a <i>Streptococcus suis</i> serotype 2 wild-type strain was used. We evaluated cytotoxic effects and colonization of both pathogens, as well as the pro-inflammatory cytokine response of the host cells. Remarkably, DNT neither contributed to the cytotoxic effects of <i>B. bronchiseptica</i> nor did it affect bacterial colonization. Regarding the cytokine response, pro-inflammatory cytokines were expressed mainly upon infection with <i>B. bronchiseptica</i> but hardly after infection with <i>S. suis</i>, whereas co-infection with both pathogens had an amplifying effect on cytokine expression after prolonged infection, independently of DNT. Concluding, we found no evidence that DNT contributes to the early stages of infection with <i>B. bronchiseptica</i> and <i>S. suis</i> in <i>in vitro</i> models of the porcine respiratory tract.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infection and Immunity
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.00366-25
Primary Topic
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mono- and co-infections of primary porcine respiratory cells with Bordetella bronchiseptica and Streptococcus suis are not affected by the dermonecrotic toxin

Muriel Dresen, Désirée Schaaf, Wolfgang Baumgärtner, Yenehiwot Berhanu Weldearegay et al.
Infection and Immunity
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
article

Mono- and co-infections of primary porcine respiratory cells with Bordetella bronchiseptica and Streptococcus suis are not affected by the dermonecrotic toxin

Muriel Dresen, Désirée Schaaf, Wolfgang Baumgärtner, Yenehiwot Berhanu Weldearegay, Michael Jarek, Susan L. Brockmeier, Jeannine Biermann, Peter Valentin-Weigand
article en

Abstract

<i>Bordetella bronchiseptica</i> is a gram-negative bacterium contributing to respiratory diseases in many different animal species. In the swine population, it occurs frequently and plays a role in the Porcine Respiratory Disease Complex as well as in the pathogenesis of atrophic rhinitis. The dermonecrotic toxin (DNT) is involved in the destruction of the nasal conchae, a hallmark of atrophic rhinitis, and several studies have shown the effects of DNT on osteoblastic cells. Surprisingly, only little is known about the interactions of DNT and respiratory epithelial cells. Thus, we investigated the influence of DNT on porcine respiratory epithelial cells during mono- and co-infections <i>in vitro</i>. For this, we infected porcine precision-cut lung slices and air-liquid interface cultures with a DNT-positive <i>B. bronchiseptica</i> wild-type strain and its isogenic DNT-deficient mutant strain. For co-infection experiments, a <i>Streptococcus suis</i> serotype 2 wild-type strain was used. We evaluated cytotoxic effects and colonization of both pathogens, as well as the pro-inflammatory cytokine response of the host cells. Remarkably, DNT neither contributed to the cytotoxic effects of <i>B. bronchiseptica</i> nor did it affect bacterial colonization. Regarding the cytokine response, pro-inflammatory cytokines were expressed mainly upon infection with <i>B. bronchiseptica</i> but hardly after infection with <i>S. suis</i>, whereas co-infection with both pathogens had an amplifying effect on cytokine expression after prolonged infection, independently of DNT. Concluding, we found no evidence that DNT contributes to the early stages of infection with <i>B. bronchiseptica</i> and <i>S. suis</i> in <i>in vitro</i> models of the porcine respiratory tract.

Infection and Immunity
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation (DE), Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (DE), University of Veterinary Medicine (HU), National Animal Disease Center (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.