Obstetric violence from the perspective of healthcare personnel: a qualitative systematic review

Background While empirical research on obstetric violence has focused primarily on women's experiences, the perspectives of healthcare personnel remain relatively neglected. Consequently, this study synthesized qualitative evidence regarding healthcare professionals’ perceptions of obstetric violence to understand how their views are constructed and which contextual factors influence the reproduction of these practices. Methodology A qualitative systematic review was conducted, covering literature published between 2019 and 2025. The search encompassed the ProQuest Central, Sage Journals, Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, and PubMed databases. Following PRISMA guidelines, 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria and addressed the research question were included. The data were analyzed using a hermeneutic approach oriented toward recovering the meanings attributed to obstetric violence within its specific production contexts. Results The reviewed studies reveal tension between recognizing and denying obstetric violence among professionals. Some discourses justify institutionalized practices under biomedical logic, while others express discomfort and internal contradictions toward actions perceived as violent yet considered part of the clinical routine. Medical hierarchy, professional training, work overload, and lack of awareness of reproductive rights were identified as factors shaping these perceptions. Differences were also observed between disciplines (e.g., midwifery vs. obstetrics) and levels of experience (e.g., professionals vs. students). Discussion Findings suggest that obstetric mistreatment is a systemic and modifiable phenomenon rather than merely a product of individual intent. Empirical intervention literature demonstrates that professional perceptions can be shifted through structured institutional reforms and training. Eradicating obstetric violence requires moving towards a systemic thinking approach that addresses institutional stressors and promotes humanized, woman-centered care models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Global Women s Health
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2026.1773729
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Obstetric violence from the perspective of healthcare personnel: a qualitative systematic review

Natalia Isabel Manjarres-Posada, Georgina Vega-Fregoso, Fátima María Guzmán-Guevara
Frontiers in Global Women s Health
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Obstetric violence from the perspective of healthcare personnel: a qualitative systematic review

Natalia Isabel Manjarres-Posada, Georgina Vega-Fregoso, Fátima María Guzmán-Guevara
article en

Abstract

Background While empirical research on obstetric violence has focused primarily on women's experiences, the perspectives of healthcare personnel remain relatively neglected. Consequently, this study synthesized qualitative evidence regarding healthcare professionals’ perceptions of obstetric violence to understand how their views are constructed and which contextual factors influence the reproduction of these practices. Methodology A qualitative systematic review was conducted, covering literature published between 2019 and 2025. The search encompassed the ProQuest Central, Sage Journals, Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, and PubMed databases. Following PRISMA guidelines, 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria and addressed the research question were included. The data were analyzed using a hermeneutic approach oriented toward recovering the meanings attributed to obstetric violence within its specific production contexts. Results The reviewed studies reveal tension between recognizing and denying obstetric violence among professionals. Some discourses justify institutionalized practices under biomedical logic, while others express discomfort and internal contradictions toward actions perceived as violent yet considered part of the clinical routine. Medical hierarchy, professional training, work overload, and lack of awareness of reproductive rights were identified as factors shaping these perceptions. Differences were also observed between disciplines (e.g., midwifery vs. obstetrics) and levels of experience (e.g., professionals vs. students). Discussion Findings suggest that obstetric mistreatment is a systemic and modifiable phenomenon rather than merely a product of individual intent. Empirical intervention literature demonstrates that professional perceptions can be shifted through structured institutional reforms and training. Eradicating obstetric violence requires moving towards a systemic thinking approach that addresses institutional stressors and promotes humanized, woman-centered care models.

Frontiers in Global Women s HealthVol. 7
Universidad de Guadalajara (MX)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.