Pedicle Screw Loosening After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery and an Analytical Review of Recurrent Loosening: Based on Revision Surgery Experience

Background:Although pedicle screw fixation is widely used in lumbar spinal fusion, screw loosening, which is well described in patients with osteoporosis, remains a clinically relevant yet insufficiently investigated problem in individuals without osteoporosis, particularly regarding revision strategies and risk factors for recurrence.This study aimed to identify risk factors for recurrent pedicle screw loosening after revision surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis using bone grafting, cement augmentation, and longer and larger-diameter screws. Material/Methods:A retrospective review included 1063 patients who underwent lumbar instrumentation between January 2021 and January 2025.Screw loosening was defined on computed tomography (CT) as a radiolucent zone greater than 1 mm or a "double-halo" sign.Seventeen patients without osteoporosis developed loosening.In these cases, the original screw tract was preserved, reinforced with allograft and semi-cured cement, and revised using screws 5 mm longer and 1 mm wider.At 3-month follow-up, patients were classified into no recurrent loosening (group A) or recurrent loosening (group B) based on CT findings. Results:Screw loosening occurred in 17 multilevel cases.Mean patient age was 60.911.1 years; 41.2% were male.Recurrent loosening occurred in 52.9% (9/17).Group A had a significantly higher T-score than did group B (-0.700.93vs -1.180.77;P=0.021). Conclusions:The combined revision approach provided acceptable short-term stability.Lower T-scores were associated with recurrent loosening despite the absence of osteoporosis.Multilevel instrumentation increased the risk of primary loosening.Larger multicenter studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Science Monitor
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.951549
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pedicle Screw Loosening After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery and an Analytical Review of Recurrent Loosening: Based on Revision Surgery Experience

Oğuzhan Uzlu, Durmuş Oğuz Karakoyun, Mağruf İlkay Yapakcı, Egemen Ünal et al.
Medical Science Monitor
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Pedicle Screw Loosening After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery and an Analytical Review of Recurrent Loosening: Based on Revision Surgery Experience

Oğuzhan Uzlu, Durmuş Oğuz Karakoyun, Mağruf İlkay Yapakcı, Egemen Ünal, Bekir Tunç, Halil İbrahim Açıkgöz, Ömer Faruk Şahin
article en

Abstract

Background:Although pedicle screw fixation is widely used in lumbar spinal fusion, screw loosening, which is well described in patients with osteoporosis, remains a clinically relevant yet insufficiently investigated problem in individuals without osteoporosis, particularly regarding revision strategies and risk factors for recurrence.This study aimed to identify risk factors for recurrent pedicle screw loosening after revision surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis using bone grafting, cement augmentation, and longer and larger-diameter screws. Material/Methods:A retrospective review included 1063 patients who underwent lumbar instrumentation between January 2021 and January 2025.Screw loosening was defined on computed tomography (CT) as a radiolucent zone greater than 1 mm or a "double-halo" sign.Seventeen patients without osteoporosis developed loosening.In these cases, the original screw tract was preserved, reinforced with allograft and semi-cured cement, and revised using screws 5 mm longer and 1 mm wider.At 3-month follow-up, patients were classified into no recurrent loosening (group A) or recurrent loosening (group B) based on CT findings. Results:Screw loosening occurred in 17 multilevel cases.Mean patient age was 60.911.1 years; 41.2% were male.Recurrent loosening occurred in 52.9% (9/17).Group A had a significantly higher T-score than did group B (-0.700.93vs -1.180.77;P=0.021). Conclusions:The combined revision approach provided acceptable short-term stability.Lower T-scores were associated with recurrent loosening despite the absence of osteoporosis.Multilevel instrumentation increased the risk of primary loosening.Larger multicenter studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Medical Science MonitorVol. 32
Izmir University (TR), Ankara University (TR), Ordu University (TR), Kastamonu University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.