I-Check: The Power of Peer - Feedback in Improving the Writing Skills of College Students

This study examines the impact of peer -feedback on the writing abilities of first-year Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSE) English majors at Cagayan State University, Philippines. The study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and experimental methods, whereby the pre-test, post-test, and three peer feedback were used to determine improvement in the various writing skills, including grammar, unity, coherence, organization, spelling, and punctuation. Qualitative data from interviews explored students' notable experiences in doing peer review. This shows that there have been notable improvements in their writing performance on these skills that were identified. This study provides support to the need for peer feedback as an effective tool for better writing skills, reduced teacher load, and collaborative learning. The findings contribute to literature on collaborative learning and provide practical implications for writing instruction.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18976793
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

I-Check: The Power of Peer - Feedback in Improving the Writing Skills of College Students

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

I-Check: The Power of Peer - Feedback in Improving the Writing Skills of College Students

article en

Abstract

This study examines the impact of peer -feedback on the writing abilities of first-year Bachelor of Secondary Education (BSE) English majors at Cagayan State University, Philippines. The study employed a mixed-methods approach, combining both qualitative and experimental methods, whereby the pre-test, post-test, and three peer feedback were used to determine improvement in the various writing skills, including grammar, unity, coherence, organization, spelling, and punctuation. Qualitative data from interviews explored students' notable experiences in doing peer review. This shows that there have been notable improvements in their writing performance on these skills that were identified. This study provides support to the need for peer feedback as an effective tool for better writing skills, reduced teacher load, and collaborative learning. The findings contribute to literature on collaborative learning and provide practical implications for writing instruction.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.