Gene Panel Versus Whole Exome Sequencing for Fetal Anomalies

In cases of fetal anomalies with genetic etiologies identified on ES, commercial gene panels had variable diagnostic yields. Panels performed worst for multisystem anomalies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prenatal Diagnosis
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.70118
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gene Panel Versus Whole Exome Sequencing for Fetal Anomalies

Matthew A. Shear, Billie Rachael Lianoglou, Mary A. Norton, Kate Swanson et al.
Prenatal Diagnosis
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Gene Panel Versus Whole Exome Sequencing for Fetal Anomalies

Matthew A. Shear, Billie Rachael Lianoglou, Mary A. Norton, Kate Swanson, Nuriye N. Sahin‐Hodoglugil, Teresa N. Sparks
article en

Abstract

In cases of fetal anomalies with genetic etiologies identified on ES, commercial gene panels had variable diagnostic yields. Panels performed worst for multisystem anomalies.

Prenatal Diagnosis
Intermountain Healthcare (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.