Twenty-Four Years Later: Are We Still Selecting the Right Tidal Volume?

Background: Twenty-four years ago, the ARDSNet trial promoted setting initial tidal volumes (VT) of 6-8 mL/kg of ideal body weight (IBW) to reduce the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and decrease mortality. Despite the evidence, this lung protective approach continues to be inconsistently implemented. This study was designed to evaluate adherence to this low-VT (LTV) strategy in a group of patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) at large university-affiliated institution in Texas. Methods: This retrospective descriptive non-experimental study was conducted in the ICU at University Hospital in San Antonio, Texas, between March 2022 and April 2022. Patients admitted to the ICU aged 18 to 80 years old who received mechanical ventilation more than 24 h were included in this study. Selected VT was recorded for every subject and compared to recommended LTV strategy. General information and ventilator parameters collected included IBW, VT, PEEP, PIP, IBW, MAP and FIO2. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted on the collected data. The Institutional Review Board approved this study. Results: Of the 61 subjects included in the study the median age was 53 y old (± 17.6). Most were male (65.6%) and Hispanic (45.9%). Mean VT was 436 mL (± 57.1; range: 270-450 mL). Based on IBW, the VT selected was 6.68 mL/kg/PBW (SD 1.03; range: IQR 25-75 5.94-8.36). The most selected VT was 420 mL (n = 11, 18%), followed by 420 mL (n = 10, 16%). Almost 1 out of 4 subjects (24.6%) were placed on a VT ≤ 6 mL/kg PBW, and 14% received a set VT of > 8 mL/kg PBW. While most subjects (98.3%) were on volume-limited ventilation, Pplat was measured and documented in only 64% of the subjects. Conclusions: Most patients ventilated in this medical ICU were placed on VTs appropriate for the IBW. However, selection of a tidal volume below and above the published guidelines on almost 50% of the subjects in this study indicates a need for better adherence to recommendations to reduce the risk of atelectrauma or overdistension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Care
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.20244135622
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Twenty-Four Years Later: Are We Still Selecting the Right Tidal Volume?

Ruben D Restrepo, Matthew Matimon, Richard Wettstein, Emily Gutierrez et al.
Respiratory Care
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Twenty-Four Years Later: Are We Still Selecting the Right Tidal Volume?

Ruben D Restrepo, Matthew Matimon, Richard Wettstein, Emily Gutierrez, Christopher Jones, Mackenzie Hoskins, Frank Haefeli, Yookyung Kim
article en

Abstract

Background: Twenty-four years ago, the ARDSNet trial promoted setting initial tidal volumes (VT) of 6-8 mL/kg of ideal body weight (IBW) to reduce the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and decrease mortality. Despite the evidence, this lung protective approach continues to be inconsistently implemented. This study was designed to evaluate adherence to this low-VT (LTV) strategy in a group of patients receiving mechanical ventilation (MV) at large university-affiliated institution in Texas. Methods: This retrospective descriptive non-experimental study was conducted in the ICU at University Hospital in San Antonio, Texas, between March 2022 and April 2022. Patients admitted to the ICU aged 18 to 80 years old who received mechanical ventilation more than 24 h were included in this study. Selected VT was recorded for every subject and compared to recommended LTV strategy. General information and ventilator parameters collected included IBW, VT, PEEP, PIP, IBW, MAP and FIO2. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted on the collected data. The Institutional Review Board approved this study. Results: Of the 61 subjects included in the study the median age was 53 y old (± 17.6). Most were male (65.6%) and Hispanic (45.9%). Mean VT was 436 mL (± 57.1; range: 270-450 mL). Based on IBW, the VT selected was 6.68 mL/kg/PBW (SD 1.03; range: IQR 25-75 5.94-8.36). The most selected VT was 420 mL (n = 11, 18%), followed by 420 mL (n = 10, 16%). Almost 1 out of 4 subjects (24.6%) were placed on a VT ≤ 6 mL/kg PBW, and 14% received a set VT of > 8 mL/kg PBW. While most subjects (98.3%) were on volume-limited ventilation, Pplat was measured and documented in only 64% of the subjects. Conclusions: Most patients ventilated in this medical ICU were placed on VTs appropriate for the IBW. However, selection of a tidal volume below and above the published guidelines on almost 50% of the subjects in this study indicates a need for better adherence to recommendations to reduce the risk of atelectrauma or overdistension.

Respiratory CareVol. 69(10_suppl)
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.