Consumer preferences for genetically engineered foods in Nigeria: Does process information matter?

Abstract Consumers in many low-income settings, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, face chronic micronutrient deficiencies. Novel food technologies, such as genetic engineering, could help mitigate this challenge, but consumer acceptance remains uncertain. Evidence suggests information provision may influence acceptance, though findings differ across regions. This study investigates how information on genetic engineering processes influences consumer preferences for biofortified cassava product (“gari”) in Nigeria. Using a discrete choice experiment with randomized treatments, respondents received either information on health benefits or health benefits and scientific processes behind conventional breeding, genetic modification, and gene editing. Results from mixed logit models, accounting for attribute non-attendance, show that consumers are willing to pay more for enhanced nutrition, but process information increased aversion to genetic modification and gene editing. Importantly, information reduced attribute non-attendance behaviour. We discuss implications for adoption and market prospects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Q Open
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoag007
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer preferences for genetically engineered foods in Nigeria: Does process information matter?

Birgit Gassler, Titilayo Oyeronke Akinwehinmi, Ramona Teuber
Q Open
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
article

Consumer preferences for genetically engineered foods in Nigeria: Does process information matter?

Birgit Gassler, Titilayo Oyeronke Akinwehinmi, Ramona Teuber
article en

Abstract

Abstract Consumers in many low-income settings, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, face chronic micronutrient deficiencies. Novel food technologies, such as genetic engineering, could help mitigate this challenge, but consumer acceptance remains uncertain. Evidence suggests information provision may influence acceptance, though findings differ across regions. This study investigates how information on genetic engineering processes influences consumer preferences for biofortified cassava product (“gari”) in Nigeria. Using a discrete choice experiment with randomized treatments, respondents received either information on health benefits or health benefits and scientific processes behind conventional breeding, genetic modification, and gene editing. Results from mixed logit models, accounting for attribute non-attendance, show that consumers are willing to pay more for enhanced nutrition, but process information increased aversion to genetic modification and gene editing. Importantly, information reduced attribute non-attendance behaviour. We discuss implications for adoption and market prospects.

Q Open
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.