Conceptual proposal for LLM-generated FDG PET/CT follow-up reports in melanoma: a pilot study on model stability and blinded expert evaluation

Purpose Oncological patients regularly undergo PET/CT re-staging, which requires a report that outlines their current disease status and highlights relevant changes compared to the previous PET/CT. Large language models (LLMs) may be helpful with documentation in the future. This study is a pilot on LLM performance, focusing on test–retest stability and reproducibility. Methods Three textbook melanoma follow-up cases of increasing complexity (involving one to eight organs) were selected. From standardized text-only prompts (no imaging data), follow-up reports were written by GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4 (each producing three independent revisions), and three nuclear medicine residents. This yielded nine reports per case (27 in total). Six blinded nuclear medicine experts (three internal, three external) performed test–retest evaluations of report quality and authorship identification. Results The cosine similarity analysis revealed high intra-case coherence (mean: 0.599–0.727) regardless of authorship. The external human readers consistently rated reports higher than the internal human readers. The LLM-generated reports received comparable or superior ratings to human reports, with Claude achieving the highest external reader scores (mean 0.926, standard deviation 0.263, on a 0–1 scale). Human performance declined with case complexity, while Claude, in particular, improved. The external readers significantly preferred the LLM impressions (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.005). Neither the human nor LLM readers reliably identified authorship (balanced accuracy 0.343–0.500). Conclusion In this pilot, blinded expert evaluation demonstrated that current LLMs can generate reports for melanoma [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT of comparable quality to human-authored reports from text prompts in this study. High test–retest stability was obtained. Larger future studies will be required to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnume.2026.1723650
Primary Topic
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conceptual proposal for LLM-generated FDG PET/CT follow-up reports in melanoma: a pilot study on model stability and blinded expert evaluation

Wolfram A. Bosbach, Wolfgang Roll, P Schindler, Foroud Aghapour Zangeneh et al.
Frontiers in Nuclear Medicine
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
article

Conceptual proposal for LLM-generated FDG PET/CT follow-up reports in melanoma: a pilot study on model stability and blinded expert evaluation

Wolfram A. Bosbach, Wolfgang Roll, P Schindler, Foroud Aghapour Zangeneh, Franziska Strunz, Nasir Gözlügöl, Federico Caobelli, A R Rominger, Ali Afshar-Oromieh, Robert Seifert, Dana Fatemeh, Marie S. Heide, David Ventura, Kuangyu Shi
article en

Abstract

Purpose Oncological patients regularly undergo PET/CT re-staging, which requires a report that outlines their current disease status and highlights relevant changes compared to the previous PET/CT. Large language models (LLMs) may be helpful with documentation in the future. This study is a pilot on LLM performance, focusing on test–retest stability and reproducibility. Methods Three textbook melanoma follow-up cases of increasing complexity (involving one to eight organs) were selected. From standardized text-only prompts (no imaging data), follow-up reports were written by GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4 (each producing three independent revisions), and three nuclear medicine residents. This yielded nine reports per case (27 in total). Six blinded nuclear medicine experts (three internal, three external) performed test–retest evaluations of report quality and authorship identification. Results The cosine similarity analysis revealed high intra-case coherence (mean: 0.599–0.727) regardless of authorship. The external human readers consistently rated reports higher than the internal human readers. The LLM-generated reports received comparable or superior ratings to human reports, with Claude achieving the highest external reader scores (mean 0.926, standard deviation 0.263, on a 0–1 scale). Human performance declined with case complexity, while Claude, in particular, improved. The external readers significantly preferred the LLM impressions (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.005). Neither the human nor LLM readers reliably identified authorship (balanced accuracy 0.343–0.500). Conclusion In this pilot, blinded expert evaluation demonstrated that current LLMs can generate reports for melanoma [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT of comparable quality to human-authored reports from text prompts in this study. High test–retest stability was obtained. Larger future studies will be required to confirm these findings.

Frontiers in Nuclear MedicineVol. 6
University Hospital of Bern (CH), University Hospital Münster (DE)
Boston Scientific Corporation, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.