Evaluating Institutional Feasibility and Readiness for NCAAA Accreditation

This study examines the readiness of Saudi higher education institutions for the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA) accreditation through a document-based, exploratory analysis of strategic plans, self-studies, annual program reports, and compliance review reports. The analysis is guided by NCAAA accreditation standards and selected international quality assurance benchmarks to assess institutional preparedness and alignment with these standards. The evaluation covers eight criteria: strategic planning, integrity and transparency, teaching and learning, students, faculty and staff, institutional resources, research and innovation, and community and partnerships. Findings indicate progress in faculty development and infrastructure but reveal a weak alignment between educational outcomes and job market needs, with varying quality across institutions. Although institutions largely meet international accreditation standards, adaptations are required for the local context. The study recommends strengthening strategic leadership, establishing continuous improvement systems, and fostering collaborations with regulatory and institutional bodies to ensure sustainable accreditation compliance and support universities in achieving national and international quality objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18848/2329-1656/cgp/a174
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Institutional Feasibility and Readiness for NCAAA Accreditation

Hazri Jamil, Ahmed T. M. Braima
The International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Evaluating Institutional Feasibility and Readiness for NCAAA Accreditation

Hazri Jamil, Ahmed T. M. Braima
article en

Abstract

This study examines the readiness of Saudi higher education institutions for the National Commission for Academic Accreditation and Assessment (NCAAA) accreditation through a document-based, exploratory analysis of strategic plans, self-studies, annual program reports, and compliance review reports. The analysis is guided by NCAAA accreditation standards and selected international quality assurance benchmarks to assess institutional preparedness and alignment with these standards. The evaluation covers eight criteria: strategic planning, integrity and transparency, teaching and learning, students, faculty and staff, institutional resources, research and innovation, and community and partnerships. Findings indicate progress in faculty development and infrastructure but reveal a weak alignment between educational outcomes and job market needs, with varying quality across institutions. Although institutions largely meet international accreditation standards, adaptations are required for the local context. The study recommends strengthening strategic leadership, establishing continuous improvement systems, and fostering collaborations with regulatory and institutional bodies to ensure sustainable accreditation compliance and support universities in achieving national and international quality objectives.

The International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership
Princeton University (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.