CT vs. MRI in nasal cavity modeling: Implications for CFD simulations and model consistency

The use of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in medicine has significantly increased over the past decade, enabling the creation of accurate patient-specific anatomical models. This study aims to compare CT and MRI scans in the reconstruction of nasal cavity geometries and their subsequent impact on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Patient-specific models were generated from both CT and MRI datasets using 3D Slicer, and airflow simulations were performed in ANSYS Fluent. The resulting models exhibited substantial geometric differences: CT-based models showed approximately four times higher volume intensity range compared to MRI-based models. Additionally, the segmentation and model preparation from MRI data required 16 hours longer than for CT data of the same patient. These findings indicate that models derived from CT and MRI scans are not directly interchangeable for CFD analysis of nasal airflow. Consequently, combining CTand MRI-based datasets within a single study may lead to inconsistencies in simulation results.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202635801024/pdf
Primary Topic
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CT vs. MRI in nasal cavity modeling: Implications for CFD simulations and model consistency

David Netuka, Filip Trnka, Hana Schmirlerová, Martin Májovský et al.
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
article

CT vs. MRI in nasal cavity modeling: Implications for CFD simulations and model consistency

David Netuka, Filip Trnka, Hana Schmirlerová, Martin Májovský, Marie Raušová
article en

Abstract

The use of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in medicine has significantly increased over the past decade, enabling the creation of accurate patient-specific anatomical models. This study aims to compare CT and MRI scans in the reconstruction of nasal cavity geometries and their subsequent impact on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Patient-specific models were generated from both CT and MRI datasets using 3D Slicer, and airflow simulations were performed in ANSYS Fluent. The resulting models exhibited substantial geometric differences: CT-based models showed approximately four times higher volume intensity range compared to MRI-based models. Additionally, the segmentation and model preparation from MRI data required 16 hours longer than for CT data of the same patient. These findings indicate that models derived from CT and MRI scans are not directly interchangeable for CFD analysis of nasal airflow. Consequently, combining CTand MRI-based datasets within a single study may lead to inconsistencies in simulation results.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Univerzita Karlova v Praze, České Vysoké Učení Technické v Praze, Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky, Ministerstvo Obrany České Republiky
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.