The Impact of Tutor Gender Match on Girls’ STEM Interest, Engagement, and Performance

Gender disparities in STEM persist despite girls performing as well as boys academically, suggesting girls may benefit from role models who shape their perceptions of STEM. We examine whether female math tutors influence girls’ STEM interest, attendance, and performance. We randomly assigned 422 ninth-grade students taking Algebra 1 to a same-gender or opposite-gender tutor. Girls assigned to female tutors reported higher STEM interest (.73 SD) and were more likely to pass the course with a C– or better (3.9 percentage points) than those with male tutors. We found no impact on attendance. Effects were stronger for students working with tutors in-person rather than virtually. We provide the first experimental evidence that female tutors can boost girls’ STEM self-concept and academic outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Educational Research Journal
Published
2026-03-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312261417332
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Tutor Gender Match on Girls’ STEM Interest, Engagement, and Performance

Joshua F. Bleiberg, Susanna Loeb, Carl Robinson, Evan Bennett
American Educational Research Journal
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

The Impact of Tutor Gender Match on Girls’ STEM Interest, Engagement, and Performance

Joshua F. Bleiberg, Susanna Loeb, Carl Robinson, Evan Bennett
article en

Abstract

Gender disparities in STEM persist despite girls performing as well as boys academically, suggesting girls may benefit from role models who shape their perceptions of STEM. We examine whether female math tutors influence girls’ STEM interest, attendance, and performance. We randomly assigned 422 ninth-grade students taking Algebra 1 to a same-gender or opposite-gender tutor. Girls assigned to female tutors reported higher STEM interest (.73 SD) and were more likely to pass the course with a C– or better (3.9 percentage points) than those with male tutors. We found no impact on attendance. Effects were stronger for students working with tutors in-person rather than virtually. We provide the first experimental evidence that female tutors can boost girls’ STEM self-concept and academic outcomes.

American Educational Research Journal
University of Pittsburgh (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US), Stanford University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.