Hiring Preferences of Respiratory Care Leaders and Trends in Degree Advancement in South Carolina

Background: There remains a debate about the entry requirements of respiratory therapists (RTs) across the United States. Although the educational requirements for credentialing exams remain at the associate-level, requirements for employment are variable between states. At this time, South Carolina (SC) does not have a baccalaureate-level entry-to-practice respiratory care program and few RTs opt to degree advance (DA). The objectives of this project were to explore the perspectives of RC leaders in SC regarding minimum education level upon hire and to understand the perspectives toward DA in the clinical environment. Methods: A descriptive, web-based survey was developed to specifically address the aims of this study. The survey was distributed to 34 respiratory care leaders identified through the SC State Society network as holding roles which required the hiring, management, mentorship, and/or supervision of RTs across SC. This project received approval through both the South Carolina Society for Respiratory Care and the Boise State Institutional Review Board. Results: Thirteen leaders with full hiring qualifications (38%) responded to the survey. 50% of respondents stated that they preferred to hire candidates with a baccalaureate degree. Reasons for not hiring baccalaureate prepared candidates included a lack of qualified applicants and positions did not require a baccalaureate degree. 80% responded that their institutions did not provide financial incentives for baccalaureate prepared candidates. However, 80% percent of those surveyed did state that the institutions provided tuition assistance for those wishing to pursue degree advancement. 80% also reported that a baccalaureate degree or higher was required for advanced roles within the institutions. Conclusions: In SC, there appears to be leader support for hiring baccalaureate prepared RTs and those seeking degree advancement. Although most managers indicated that programs such as tuition assistance and career advancement options were available to those seeking at least a baccalaureate degree, it was noted by a majority of respondents that there is a lack of financial incentive provided for respiratory therapists at the baccalaureate level or higher. This may indicate a disconnect in motivation for RTs to pursue DA. More information regarding methods to provide financial incentives is needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Care
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.20244137690
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hiring Preferences of Respiratory Care Leaders and Trends in Degree Advancement in South Carolina

Megan Spurny Koster, Amanda Coffey
Respiratory Care
Delphi Technique in Research
article

Hiring Preferences of Respiratory Care Leaders and Trends in Degree Advancement in South Carolina

Megan Spurny Koster, Amanda Coffey
article en

Abstract

Background: There remains a debate about the entry requirements of respiratory therapists (RTs) across the United States. Although the educational requirements for credentialing exams remain at the associate-level, requirements for employment are variable between states. At this time, South Carolina (SC) does not have a baccalaureate-level entry-to-practice respiratory care program and few RTs opt to degree advance (DA). The objectives of this project were to explore the perspectives of RC leaders in SC regarding minimum education level upon hire and to understand the perspectives toward DA in the clinical environment. Methods: A descriptive, web-based survey was developed to specifically address the aims of this study. The survey was distributed to 34 respiratory care leaders identified through the SC State Society network as holding roles which required the hiring, management, mentorship, and/or supervision of RTs across SC. This project received approval through both the South Carolina Society for Respiratory Care and the Boise State Institutional Review Board. Results: Thirteen leaders with full hiring qualifications (38%) responded to the survey. 50% of respondents stated that they preferred to hire candidates with a baccalaureate degree. Reasons for not hiring baccalaureate prepared candidates included a lack of qualified applicants and positions did not require a baccalaureate degree. 80% responded that their institutions did not provide financial incentives for baccalaureate prepared candidates. However, 80% percent of those surveyed did state that the institutions provided tuition assistance for those wishing to pursue degree advancement. 80% also reported that a baccalaureate degree or higher was required for advanced roles within the institutions. Conclusions: In SC, there appears to be leader support for hiring baccalaureate prepared RTs and those seeking degree advancement. Although most managers indicated that programs such as tuition assistance and career advancement options were available to those seeking at least a baccalaureate degree, it was noted by a majority of respondents that there is a lack of financial incentive provided for respiratory therapists at the baccalaureate level or higher. This may indicate a disconnect in motivation for RTs to pursue DA. More information regarding methods to provide financial incentives is needed.

Respiratory CareVol. 69(10_suppl)
Boise State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.