Can Chatbots Advance Participatory Disaster Risk Reduction for Sustainable Development and Resilient Human Settlement? A Systematic Review With Bibliometric Analysis

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are increasingly used as a community engagement tool, yet their contribution to participatory disaster risk reduction (DRR) and sustainable development remains unclear. This study synthesises the state of knowledge on chatbots for participatory DRR and assesses how the evidence aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 11 (sustainable cities and communities), SDG 13 (climate action) and SDG 16 (inclusive institutions). Following PRISMA guidelines, 57 peer‐reviewed studies were selected from major academic databases. The synthesis reveals rapid growth of interest but limited rigorous evaluation of outcomes that matter for risk reduction and sustainable development, such as protective actions taken, long‐term mitigation, inclusion of marginalised groups, hybrid architecture integration and governance, including data stewardship and integration with local institutions. Findings reveal that chatbots are methodologically fragmented, reflecting limited integration between technology and disaster domains and minimal engagement with end users. By consolidating fragmented evidence and highlighting gaps, the review clarifies where chatbots can add value to people‐centred, participatory DRR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70928
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Chatbots Advance Participatory Disaster Risk Reduction for Sustainable Development and Resilient Human Settlement? A Systematic Review With Bibliometric Analysis

Amila Jayasinghe, Pradeep Kalansooriya, Harini Sawandi, Choolaka Hewawasam et al.
Sustainable Development
AI in Service Interactions
article

Can Chatbots Advance Participatory Disaster Risk Reduction for Sustainable Development and Resilient Human Settlement? A Systematic Review With Bibliometric Analysis

Amila Jayasinghe, Pradeep Kalansooriya, Harini Sawandi, Choolaka Hewawasam, Buddhika Amila, Jasintha Jayasanka
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots are increasingly used as a community engagement tool, yet their contribution to participatory disaster risk reduction (DRR) and sustainable development remains unclear. This study synthesises the state of knowledge on chatbots for participatory DRR and assesses how the evidence aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 11 (sustainable cities and communities), SDG 13 (climate action) and SDG 16 (inclusive institutions). Following PRISMA guidelines, 57 peer‐reviewed studies were selected from major academic databases. The synthesis reveals rapid growth of interest but limited rigorous evaluation of outcomes that matter for risk reduction and sustainable development, such as protective actions taken, long‐term mitigation, inclusion of marginalised groups, hybrid architecture integration and governance, including data stewardship and integration with local institutions. Findings reveal that chatbots are methodologically fragmented, reflecting limited integration between technology and disaster domains and minimal engagement with end users. By consolidating fragmented evidence and highlighting gaps, the review clarifies where chatbots can add value to people‐centred, participatory DRR.

Sustainable Development
University of Sri Jayewardenepura (LK), University of Moratuwa (LK), General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University (LK)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.