What Do Adults Know and Think About the United Kingdom Physical Activity Guidelines, and How Should They be Communicated? A Qualitative Exploration

ABSTRACT Introduction Currently, there is limited insight into public understanding and opinion of physical activity guidelines (PAG) despite the acknowledged importance of communicating such health‐related information. This study aimed to explore adults' understanding and opinions of current UK Chief Medical Officer's PAG (UKCMOPAG) in addition to messaging preferences to inform effective communication of future PAG. Methods Qualitative semi‐structured one‐to‐one interviews were conducted with 17 adults (52% female, mean age 33.1 years) in Scotland, United Kingdom. The interview schedule included open‐ended questions developed to explore understanding and opinion of guidelines, and preferences for communication using the physical activity messaging framework. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Results Participants were aware that PAG likely existed but could not accurately recall them. Once informed of the UKCMOPAG, they found them unappealing and unclear. They expressed uncertainty about the intended audience and questioned their relevance across different groups. Participants were, however, aware of some benefits of PA and had lived experience of short‐term benefits (e.g., improved sleep and mood). As such, there was a preference for communicating UKCMOPAG through positive, relatable messages emphasising everyday benefits. Participants disliked threshold messages, suggesting continuum‐based messages with a sliding scale of PA volume/intensity and associated benefits. Lastly, participants indicated that messages should be delivered by trustworthy sources, identified as the National Health Service (NHS). Conclusion This study is the first qualitative exploration of how the general adult population in Scotland interpret the UKCMOPAG. Findings show that current communication strategies are not aligned to public understanding and opinions of PAG, indicating a need to change communication approaches. Future updates should separate technical guidance from public‐facing messages, use relatable language, inclusive examples and ensure delivery by trusted sources. Continuum‐ and gain‐framed messaging highlighting short‐term PA benefits may also improve engagement. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of such audience‐centred messages.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Public Health Guidelines
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/gin2.70066
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Do Adults Know and Think About the United Kingdom Physical Activity Guidelines, and How Should They be Communicated? A Qualitative Exploration

Graham Baker, P.G. Kelly, Chloë Williamson, Gwen Gillham
Clinical and Public Health Guidelines
Physical Activity and Health
article

What Do Adults Know and Think About the United Kingdom Physical Activity Guidelines, and How Should They be Communicated? A Qualitative Exploration

Graham Baker, P.G. Kelly, Chloë Williamson, Gwen Gillham
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Currently, there is limited insight into public understanding and opinion of physical activity guidelines (PAG) despite the acknowledged importance of communicating such health‐related information. This study aimed to explore adults' understanding and opinions of current UK Chief Medical Officer's PAG (UKCMOPAG) in addition to messaging preferences to inform effective communication of future PAG. Methods Qualitative semi‐structured one‐to‐one interviews were conducted with 17 adults (52% female, mean age 33.1 years) in Scotland, United Kingdom. The interview schedule included open‐ended questions developed to explore understanding and opinion of guidelines, and preferences for communication using the physical activity messaging framework. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Results Participants were aware that PAG likely existed but could not accurately recall them. Once informed of the UKCMOPAG, they found them unappealing and unclear. They expressed uncertainty about the intended audience and questioned their relevance across different groups. Participants were, however, aware of some benefits of PA and had lived experience of short‐term benefits (e.g., improved sleep and mood). As such, there was a preference for communicating UKCMOPAG through positive, relatable messages emphasising everyday benefits. Participants disliked threshold messages, suggesting continuum‐based messages with a sliding scale of PA volume/intensity and associated benefits. Lastly, participants indicated that messages should be delivered by trustworthy sources, identified as the National Health Service (NHS). Conclusion This study is the first qualitative exploration of how the general adult population in Scotland interpret the UKCMOPAG. Findings show that current communication strategies are not aligned to public understanding and opinions of PAG, indicating a need to change communication approaches. Future updates should separate technical guidance from public‐facing messages, use relatable language, inclusive examples and ensure delivery by trusted sources. Continuum‐ and gain‐framed messaging highlighting short‐term PA benefits may also improve engagement. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of such audience‐centred messages.

Clinical and Public Health GuidelinesVol. 3(2)
MRC Centre for Reproductive Health (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.