Fairness and music streaming platforms in Europe: Professionals, ideas and framings

The article examines how professionals in the European music industry address fairness in the context of music streaming services (MSS). Drawing on Discursive Institutionalism and framing analysis, it explores the main ideas through which industry stakeholders interpret and justify fairness. Based on 22 semi-structured interviews and an online survey, the analysis identifies three interrelated narratives: fairness as redistribution of value, fairness as balance of power and fairness as equality of opportunity. These narratives illustrate how professionals mobilise fairness to interpret both the challenges introduced by MSS and the need to renegotiate long-standing arrangements within the sector. The findings provide an empirical contribution to debates on fairness by capturing the bottom-up ideas of industry actors, showing that concerns about remuneration, transparency and diversity transcend purely economic or technical dimensions. The article argues that understanding these ideational dynamics is essential for informing future discussions on cultural policy and platform governance in the creative industries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media Culture & Society
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437261423073
Primary Topic
Copyright and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fairness and music streaming platforms in Europe: Professionals, ideas and framings

Marina Rossato Fernandes, Antonios Vlassis
Media Culture & Society
Copyright and Intellectual Property
article

Fairness and music streaming platforms in Europe: Professionals, ideas and framings

Marina Rossato Fernandes, Antonios Vlassis
article en

Abstract

The article examines how professionals in the European music industry address fairness in the context of music streaming services (MSS). Drawing on Discursive Institutionalism and framing analysis, it explores the main ideas through which industry stakeholders interpret and justify fairness. Based on 22 semi-structured interviews and an online survey, the analysis identifies three interrelated narratives: fairness as redistribution of value, fairness as balance of power and fairness as equality of opportunity. These narratives illustrate how professionals mobilise fairness to interpret both the challenges introduced by MSS and the need to renegotiate long-standing arrangements within the sector. The findings provide an empirical contribution to debates on fairness by capturing the bottom-up ideas of industry actors, showing that concerns about remuneration, transparency and diversity transcend purely economic or technical dimensions. The article argues that understanding these ideational dynamics is essential for informing future discussions on cultural policy and platform governance in the creative industries.

Media Culture & Society
University of Liège (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Copyright and Intellectual Property
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.