Hydrophilicity and Hydrophobicity at the Nanoscale: A Theoretical Study on Two-Dimensional Cylindrical Droplets with Disjoining Pressure Effects

Hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity are incompatible in the sense that a single substrate cannot exhibit both characteristics simultaneously. On a hydrophobic substrate, for example, a macroscopic droplet always exhibits a morphology with a contact angle higher than 90°, never lower than 90°. In this paper, we theoretically demonstrate the possibility that a nanoscale droplet can exhibit a contact angle lower than 90° on the same hydrophobic substrate. To demonstrate this, we analyze the morphology and contact angle of a sessile droplet on smooth flat substrates, taking into account disjoining pressure of Lennard–Jones type. By constraining the two-dimensional cylindrical droplet and minimizing the free-energy functional, we derive a formula to determine the droplet’s morphology and the boundary between hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact angles for finite-sized droplets. Using this formulation, we reconsider the formula for the macroscopic contact angle, known as the Derjaguin–Frumkin formula. By utilizing a simple disjoining pressure model, we find that the calculated contact angle at the nanoscale is always smaller than the macroscopic contact angle determined by the Derjaguin–Frumkin formula. Consequently, the wettability (hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity) differs at the nanoscale compared to the macroscale. We further discuss the implication of our results on the size-dependent contact angle and line tension at the nanoscale.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liquids
Published
2026-03-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/liquids6010011
Primary Topic
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hydrophilicity and Hydrophobicity at the Nanoscale: A Theoretical Study on Two-Dimensional Cylindrical Droplets with Disjoining Pressure Effects

Masao Iwamatsu
Liquids
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
article

Hydrophilicity and Hydrophobicity at the Nanoscale: A Theoretical Study on Two-Dimensional Cylindrical Droplets with Disjoining Pressure Effects

Masao Iwamatsu
article en

Abstract

Hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity are incompatible in the sense that a single substrate cannot exhibit both characteristics simultaneously. On a hydrophobic substrate, for example, a macroscopic droplet always exhibits a morphology with a contact angle higher than 90°, never lower than 90°. In this paper, we theoretically demonstrate the possibility that a nanoscale droplet can exhibit a contact angle lower than 90° on the same hydrophobic substrate. To demonstrate this, we analyze the morphology and contact angle of a sessile droplet on smooth flat substrates, taking into account disjoining pressure of Lennard–Jones type. By constraining the two-dimensional cylindrical droplet and minimizing the free-energy functional, we derive a formula to determine the droplet’s morphology and the boundary between hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact angles for finite-sized droplets. Using this formulation, we reconsider the formula for the macroscopic contact angle, known as the Derjaguin–Frumkin formula. By utilizing a simple disjoining pressure model, we find that the calculated contact angle at the nanoscale is always smaller than the macroscopic contact angle determined by the Derjaguin–Frumkin formula. Consequently, the wettability (hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity) differs at the nanoscale compared to the macroscale. We further discuss the implication of our results on the size-dependent contact angle and line tension at the nanoscale.

LiquidsVol. 6(1)
Tokyo City University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.