Epicardial Fat Parameters on Multidetector Computed Tomography as Predictors of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Objective This study was designed to test if multidetector computed tomography-derived epicardial fat parameters like epicardial fat volume, thickness, and attenuation can predict obstructive coronary artery disease in a South Indian Population. Methods All 60 patients underwent a coronary angiogram using 128-slice multidetector computed tomography. Computed tomography coronary angiogram studies were evaluated for coronary artery calcium score, presence of plaque, type of plaque, epicardial fat volume, and degree of coronary stenosis. Results 60 patients had a mean age of 51.7 ± 11.4 years. Obstructive coronary artery disease (≥50% luminal narrowing) was found in 91.7% of males. Various risk factors for coronary artery disease were diabetes mellitus (40%), hypertension (55%), hyperlipidemia (58.33%), smoking (15%), and body mass index >25 (41.67%). These risk factors were higher in the “obstructive coronary artery disease” group than in the “no/non-obstructive coronary artery disease” group, with a statistically significant correlation. Mean epicardial fat volume for the studied population was found to be 114.26 ± 45.68 cm 3 with values ranging from 38.55 cm 3 to 270.08 cm 3 . The mean epicardial fat volume of “obstructive coronary artery disease” group was found to be higher, that is, 137.69 ± 29.44 cm 3 compared to “no/non-obstructive coronary artery disease” group, which was 108.4 ± 47 cm 3 , showing a statistically significant correlation ( P = .046). Multiple variables showed a positive correlation of epicardial fat volume with the increasing degree of coronary artery stenosis. Epicardial fat volume demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with age ( P = .007), hypertension ( P = .001), hyperlipidemia ( P = .034), smoking ( P = .002), and body mass index ( P < .001). Epicardial fat volume also showed a statistically significant correlation with the epicardial mesenteric fat area ( P < .001), calcium score ( P = .048), and epicardial fat thickness ( P < .001). An increase in epicardial fat volume was observed with higher calcium score categories, showing a statistically significant correlation ( P = .02). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, an optimal cutoff value of >110.48 cm 3 was obtained, which shows a sensitivity and specificity of 91.67% and 60.42%, respectively. Epicardial fat volume (multidetector computed tomography) is a significant imaging biomarker for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease with a cutoff value of >110.48 cm³ for differentiating.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Clinical Cardiology
Published
2026-03-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/26324636261426034
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epicardial Fat Parameters on Multidetector Computed Tomography as Predictors of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Sujata Patnaik, S. Rammurti, A. Uma Chandran, Amaresh Rao
Indian Journal of Clinical Cardiology
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
article

Epicardial Fat Parameters on Multidetector Computed Tomography as Predictors of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Sujata Patnaik, S. Rammurti, A. Uma Chandran, Amaresh Rao
article en

Abstract

Objective This study was designed to test if multidetector computed tomography-derived epicardial fat parameters like epicardial fat volume, thickness, and attenuation can predict obstructive coronary artery disease in a South Indian Population. Methods All 60 patients underwent a coronary angiogram using 128-slice multidetector computed tomography. Computed tomography coronary angiogram studies were evaluated for coronary artery calcium score, presence of plaque, type of plaque, epicardial fat volume, and degree of coronary stenosis. Results 60 patients had a mean age of 51.7 ± 11.4 years. Obstructive coronary artery disease (≥50% luminal narrowing) was found in 91.7% of males. Various risk factors for coronary artery disease were diabetes mellitus (40%), hypertension (55%), hyperlipidemia (58.33%), smoking (15%), and body mass index >25 (41.67%). These risk factors were higher in the “obstructive coronary artery disease” group than in the “no/non-obstructive coronary artery disease” group, with a statistically significant correlation. Mean epicardial fat volume for the studied population was found to be 114.26 ± 45.68 cm 3 with values ranging from 38.55 cm 3 to 270.08 cm 3 . The mean epicardial fat volume of “obstructive coronary artery disease” group was found to be higher, that is, 137.69 ± 29.44 cm 3 compared to “no/non-obstructive coronary artery disease” group, which was 108.4 ± 47 cm 3 , showing a statistically significant correlation ( P = .046). Multiple variables showed a positive correlation of epicardial fat volume with the increasing degree of coronary artery stenosis. Epicardial fat volume demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with age ( P = .007), hypertension ( P = .001), hyperlipidemia ( P = .034), smoking ( P = .002), and body mass index ( P < .001). Epicardial fat volume also showed a statistically significant correlation with the epicardial mesenteric fat area ( P < .001), calcium score ( P = .048), and epicardial fat thickness ( P < .001). An increase in epicardial fat volume was observed with higher calcium score categories, showing a statistically significant correlation ( P = .02). Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve, an optimal cutoff value of >110.48 cm 3 was obtained, which shows a sensitivity and specificity of 91.67% and 60.42%, respectively. Epicardial fat volume (multidetector computed tomography) is a significant imaging biomarker for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease with a cutoff value of >110.48 cm³ for differentiating.

Indian Journal of Clinical Cardiology
Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.