Conservation planning in the Weddell Sea (Antarctica): A comparative analysis of decision-support tools

Intense human activities negatively impact marine ecosystems, creating an urgent need for effective strategies to safeguard marine biodiversity and ecosystem services. Systematic conservation planning has become a key approach to identify priority areas and design management measures. The Marxan software, based on simulated annealing (SA) algorithms, is widely used in this context. However, recent advances in integer linear programming (ILP), as implemented in the prioritizr R package, offer a promising alternative with improved optimisation performance and solution quality. In this study, we compare prioritisation solutions generated using SA (Marxan) and ILP (prioritizr) for the Weddell Sea Marine Protected Area Phase 1 (WSMPA P1), one of four Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) currently proposed and under negotiation by the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR). The planning area includes 57,077 hexagonal planning units covering almost 3 million km² and 54 conservation features, alongside a cost metric reflecting potential Antarctic toothfish fisheries interests. Three conservation target scenarios - minimum, mixed, and medium - were evaluated to assess the performance of both approaches. Our results show that both methods identify largely overlapping priority areas. However, ILP solutions consistently exhibit less spatial fragmentation, smaller total area and lower costs, resulting in more compact and cost-efficient reserve designs without extensive parameter calibration. Computational times were comparable for the minimum and mixed target scenarios; for the medium scenario, prioritizr required moderately more processing time. These findings highlight the benefits of ILP for systematic conservation planning, particularly in real-world contexts where time for scenario calibration is often limited during stakeholder consultations and political negotiations. Our study suggests ILP-based methods as a valuable alternative to SA for the WSMPA P1 planning process, thereby strengthening the scientific foundation for effective marine conservation strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18981787
Primary Topic
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conservation planning in the Weddell Sea (Antarctica): A comparative analysis of decision-support tools

Anonymous
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
article

Conservation planning in the Weddell Sea (Antarctica): A comparative analysis of decision-support tools

Anonymous
article en

Abstract

Intense human activities negatively impact marine ecosystems, creating an urgent need for effective strategies to safeguard marine biodiversity and ecosystem services. Systematic conservation planning has become a key approach to identify priority areas and design management measures. The Marxan software, based on simulated annealing (SA) algorithms, is widely used in this context. However, recent advances in integer linear programming (ILP), as implemented in the prioritizr R package, offer a promising alternative with improved optimisation performance and solution quality. In this study, we compare prioritisation solutions generated using SA (Marxan) and ILP (prioritizr) for the Weddell Sea Marine Protected Area Phase 1 (WSMPA P1), one of four Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) currently proposed and under negotiation by the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR). The planning area includes 57,077 hexagonal planning units covering almost 3 million km² and 54 conservation features, alongside a cost metric reflecting potential Antarctic toothfish fisheries interests. Three conservation target scenarios - minimum, mixed, and medium - were evaluated to assess the performance of both approaches. Our results show that both methods identify largely overlapping priority areas. However, ILP solutions consistently exhibit less spatial fragmentation, smaller total area and lower costs, resulting in more compact and cost-efficient reserve designs without extensive parameter calibration. Computational times were comparable for the minimum and mixed target scenarios; for the medium scenario, prioritizr required moderately more processing time. These findings highlight the benefits of ILP for systematic conservation planning, particularly in real-world contexts where time for scenario calibration is often limited during stakeholder consultations and political negotiations. Our study suggests ILP-based methods as a valuable alternative to SA for the WSMPA P1 planning process, thereby strengthening the scientific foundation for effective marine conservation strategies.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.