An illusion of equability: Paleoclimate proxies, environmental variability, and temperature seasonality in greenhouse worlds

The Equable Climate Problem refers to long-standing disagreements between lithologic proxy-based reconstructions and climate model simulations of greenhouse climate systems. One key greenhouse climate parameter upon which proxies and models fail to agree is mean annual range in temperature (MART), which is an important component of terrestrial climate and a key control on biogeography and diversity. Proxy-based MART estimates during greenhouse periods vary significantly depending on proxy type, which has inhibited attempts to resolve the discrepancies in proxy/model MART estimates. Paleobotany-based proxies (e.g., the Climate Leaf Analysis Multivariate Program, known as CLAMP) suggest reduced MARTs relative to the modern, while geochemistry-based proxies (e.g., pedogenic carbonate clumped isotopes) suggest similar to modern MARTs. One potential explanation for these diverging proxy-based MART reconstructions is that they reflect true MART variability due to the unique environmental conditions associated with the different proxies (e.g., differences in relative humidity, soil moisture, etc.). To test this hypothesis, we employ a conditional autoregressive statistical model and global long-term land cover, topographic, and climate data to quantify the influence of different proxy formation environments on MART. We show that land cover differences, which reflect local differences in environmental conditions, have a statistically significant effect on MART magnitude. Thus, after considering location, topography, and precipitation, proxy MART differences are largely explained by differences in land cover. Cretaceous and Eocene MART results from two multi-proxy case studies are consistent with this statistical analysis. These findings suggest that the variable proxy-based MART reconstructions for past greenhouse periods reflect real variations in MART. Perhaps most importantly, this analysis suggests that at any given latitude, greenhouse period MARTs were similar in magnitude and variability to modern MARTs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geological Society of America Bulletin
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1130/b38825.1
Primary Topic
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An illusion of equability: Paleoclimate proxies, environmental variability, and temperature seasonality in greenhouse worlds

Emily H. Griffith, Landon Burgener, Ethan Hyland
Geological Society of America Bulletin
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
article

An illusion of equability: Paleoclimate proxies, environmental variability, and temperature seasonality in greenhouse worlds

Emily H. Griffith, Landon Burgener, Ethan Hyland
article en

Abstract

The Equable Climate Problem refers to long-standing disagreements between lithologic proxy-based reconstructions and climate model simulations of greenhouse climate systems. One key greenhouse climate parameter upon which proxies and models fail to agree is mean annual range in temperature (MART), which is an important component of terrestrial climate and a key control on biogeography and diversity. Proxy-based MART estimates during greenhouse periods vary significantly depending on proxy type, which has inhibited attempts to resolve the discrepancies in proxy/model MART estimates. Paleobotany-based proxies (e.g., the Climate Leaf Analysis Multivariate Program, known as CLAMP) suggest reduced MARTs relative to the modern, while geochemistry-based proxies (e.g., pedogenic carbonate clumped isotopes) suggest similar to modern MARTs. One potential explanation for these diverging proxy-based MART reconstructions is that they reflect true MART variability due to the unique environmental conditions associated with the different proxies (e.g., differences in relative humidity, soil moisture, etc.). To test this hypothesis, we employ a conditional autoregressive statistical model and global long-term land cover, topographic, and climate data to quantify the influence of different proxy formation environments on MART. We show that land cover differences, which reflect local differences in environmental conditions, have a statistically significant effect on MART magnitude. Thus, after considering location, topography, and precipitation, proxy MART differences are largely explained by differences in land cover. Cretaceous and Eocene MART results from two multi-proxy case studies are consistent with this statistical analysis. These findings suggest that the variable proxy-based MART reconstructions for past greenhouse periods reflect real variations in MART. Perhaps most importantly, this analysis suggests that at any given latitude, greenhouse period MARTs were similar in magnitude and variability to modern MARTs.

Geological Society of America Bulletin
Brigham Young University (US), North Carolina State University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.