Augmenting 16-Run Two-Level Non-Regular Fractional Factorial Designs

When the resources for experimentation are limited, experimenters usually turn to the class of 2-level fractional factorial designs. Resolution III fractional factorial designs are the smallest available designs, but they alias main effects and 2-factor interactions. The class of Resolution IV designs avoids this and provides clear estimates of the main effects, assuming that 3-factor and higher-order interactions are not active. Meanwhile, some two-factor interactions remain aliased with each other. Resolution V designs have no aliasing of main effects and two-factor interactions, assuming that all higher-order interactions are inactive. However, they are often too large for situations with six or more factors of interest. For example, with six factors, the only design capable of estimating all main effects and 2-factor interactions has 32 runs. Consequently, resource restrictions often require experimenters to use smaller designs of lower resolution, typically Resolution IV. The aliasing of effects often requires additional follow-up experimentation to de-alias all active effects. However, there are situations in which follow-up experiments are impossible to perform due to the unavailability of certain test resources. An alternative to using a 16-run Resolution IV design and a follow-up experiment is to use a design with more than 16 runs as the initial experiment. We investigated a strategy for initially augmenting a class of 16-run Resolution IV designs with either 4 or 8 runs. We use a simulation study to show that this augmentation strategy improves the ability to estimate active factors when standard analysis methods are employed. The analysis methods used in this study are Stepwise, LASSO, and Dantzig.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematics
Published
2026-03-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/math14060957
Primary Topic
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Augmenting 16-Run Two-Level Non-Regular Fractional Factorial Designs

Carly E. Metcalfe, Hanan Abdulrahman Alqarni, Douglas C. Montgomery
Mathematics
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
article

Augmenting 16-Run Two-Level Non-Regular Fractional Factorial Designs

Carly E. Metcalfe, Hanan Abdulrahman Alqarni, Douglas C. Montgomery
article en

Abstract

When the resources for experimentation are limited, experimenters usually turn to the class of 2-level fractional factorial designs. Resolution III fractional factorial designs are the smallest available designs, but they alias main effects and 2-factor interactions. The class of Resolution IV designs avoids this and provides clear estimates of the main effects, assuming that 3-factor and higher-order interactions are not active. Meanwhile, some two-factor interactions remain aliased with each other. Resolution V designs have no aliasing of main effects and two-factor interactions, assuming that all higher-order interactions are inactive. However, they are often too large for situations with six or more factors of interest. For example, with six factors, the only design capable of estimating all main effects and 2-factor interactions has 32 runs. Consequently, resource restrictions often require experimenters to use smaller designs of lower resolution, typically Resolution IV. The aliasing of effects often requires additional follow-up experimentation to de-alias all active effects. However, there are situations in which follow-up experiments are impossible to perform due to the unavailability of certain test resources. An alternative to using a 16-run Resolution IV design and a follow-up experiment is to use a design with more than 16 runs as the initial experiment. We investigated a strategy for initially augmenting a class of 16-run Resolution IV designs with either 4 or 8 runs. We use a simulation study to show that this augmentation strategy improves the ability to estimate active factors when standard analysis methods are employed. The analysis methods used in this study are Stepwise, LASSO, and Dantzig.

MathematicsVol. 14(6)
Rochester Institute of Technology (US), Arizona State University (US)
U.S. Department of Defense
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Optimal Experimental Design Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Augmenting 16-Run Two-Level Non-Regular Fractional Factorial Designs — Carly E. Metcalfe, Hanan Abdulrahman Alqarni, et al. · Mathematics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS