Intersectional Reflexivity and Sociological Empathy: Building Legitimacy in Participatory Research Involving LGBTIQ+ Individuals With a Migration Background

In line with questions raised in decolonial feminist research, this article examines the extent to which methodology can transform asymmetrical relationships with respect to age, gender identity, sexual orientation, race, and class between researchers and participants. The analysis is based on field notes from interviews conducted in a participatory research project on the intersectional discrimination experienced by LGBTIQ+ individuals with a migration background in Switzerland. Results show how the articulation of a participatory approach, intersectional reflexivity, and sociological empathy is crucial when conducting research with multiply minoritized people on sensitive topics. Interviews require researchers to reflect on their positionality. Each research encounter involves multiple positionalities based on the diverse, fluid identities that researchers and participants identify with and attribute to each other. Interviews also require that researchers build safety and trust so that participants can experience empathy. Challenges and difficulties in some types of interviews, as with multiply marginalized people or interpreter assistance, clearly show how building safety and trust through intersectional reflexivity and sociological empathy is an ongoing process that requires constant critique and improvement. Our findings support the epistemological position that research teams should include more people directly concerned by the issues under study. They also call for a paradigm shift in academia—one that research funders must actively support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069261420741
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectional Reflexivity and Sociological Empathy: Building Legitimacy in Participatory Research Involving LGBTIQ+ Individuals With a Migration Background

Laura Mellini, Morgane Jomini, Francesca Poglia Mileti, Sab Masson
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Intersectional Reflexivity and Sociological Empathy: Building Legitimacy in Participatory Research Involving LGBTIQ+ Individuals With a Migration Background

Laura Mellini, Morgane Jomini, Francesca Poglia Mileti, Sab Masson
article en

Abstract

In line with questions raised in decolonial feminist research, this article examines the extent to which methodology can transform asymmetrical relationships with respect to age, gender identity, sexual orientation, race, and class between researchers and participants. The analysis is based on field notes from interviews conducted in a participatory research project on the intersectional discrimination experienced by LGBTIQ+ individuals with a migration background in Switzerland. Results show how the articulation of a participatory approach, intersectional reflexivity, and sociological empathy is crucial when conducting research with multiply minoritized people on sensitive topics. Interviews require researchers to reflect on their positionality. Each research encounter involves multiple positionalities based on the diverse, fluid identities that researchers and participants identify with and attribute to each other. Interviews also require that researchers build safety and trust so that participants can experience empathy. Challenges and difficulties in some types of interviews, as with multiply marginalized people or interpreter assistance, clearly show how building safety and trust through intersectional reflexivity and sociological empathy is an ongoing process that requires constant critique and improvement. Our findings support the epistemological position that research teams should include more people directly concerned by the issues under study. They also call for a paradigm shift in academia—one that research funders must actively support.

International Journal of Qualitative MethodsVol. 25
University of Fribourg (CH)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.